"Proper” Profiles. On Facebook’s investment in the autobiographical genre

Susanne Fuchs
{"title":"\"Proper” Profiles. On Facebook’s investment in the autobiographical genre","authors":"Susanne Fuchs","doi":"10.5463/EJLW.5.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term “Fake profile” was invented by the press to designate Facebook-profiles that do not represent the life of their authors, but are instead used for depictions of alter egos or fictional characters. The following article investigates how the term “Fake profile” introduces a genre-designation that causes its alleged opposite, the “proper” profile to emerge. Put in conversation with Jacques Derrida’s discussion of the law of genre and Michel Foucault’s questioning of the referential function of the name of the author it becomes apparent, that the difference between “fake” and “proper” cannot be sustained; the signature of the author does not stabilize the relationship between the writer and the contents of the written text. It is ironically the company’s own attempt to guarantee the “authenticity” of the profiles established on the platform through a real name requirement, that draws attention to the impossibility of the fixation of this relation. The article examines in how far the suspension of genre-designations (fake and proper) causes the unease with which online-identities are generally regarded within the press and the Academic discourse. This article was submitted on July 22nd 2015 and published on May 24th 2916.","PeriodicalId":263826,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Life Writing","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Life Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/EJLW.5.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term “Fake profile” was invented by the press to designate Facebook-profiles that do not represent the life of their authors, but are instead used for depictions of alter egos or fictional characters. The following article investigates how the term “Fake profile” introduces a genre-designation that causes its alleged opposite, the “proper” profile to emerge. Put in conversation with Jacques Derrida’s discussion of the law of genre and Michel Foucault’s questioning of the referential function of the name of the author it becomes apparent, that the difference between “fake” and “proper” cannot be sustained; the signature of the author does not stabilize the relationship between the writer and the contents of the written text. It is ironically the company’s own attempt to guarantee the “authenticity” of the profiles established on the platform through a real name requirement, that draws attention to the impossibility of the fixation of this relation. The article examines in how far the suspension of genre-designations (fake and proper) causes the unease with which online-identities are generally regarded within the press and the Academic discourse. This article was submitted on July 22nd 2015 and published on May 24th 2916.
“适当的”配置文件。谈Facebook对自传体题材的投资
“假个人资料”这个词是媒体发明的,用来指那些不代表作者生活,而是用来描述另一个自我或虚构人物的facebook个人资料。下面这篇文章将调查“假档案”一词是如何引入一种类型名称,从而导致其所谓的对立面——“正确”档案的出现。与雅克·德里达对体体法的讨论和米歇尔·福柯对作者名字的指称功能的质疑进行对话,很明显,“假”和“真”之间的区别是无法持续的;作者的签名并不能稳定作者与书面文本内容之间的关系。具有讽刺意味的是,该公司自己试图通过实名要求来保证在平台上建立的个人资料的“真实性”,这引起了人们对这种关系固定的不可能性的关注。这篇文章考察了在多大程度上暂停类型指定(假的和正确的)引起了不安,网络身份通常被认为是在新闻界和学术话语中。本文于2015年7月22日提交,2016年5月24日发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信