Evaluation of Learner vs. Teacher Centered Syllabi in Construction Management Courses: An Initial Investigation

Benjamin Farrow, Tom Leathem, Amna Salman
{"title":"Evaluation of Learner vs. Teacher Centered Syllabi in Construction Management Courses: An Initial Investigation","authors":"Benjamin Farrow, Tom Leathem, Amna Salman","doi":"10.11114/ijce.v5i1.5403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research indicates that retention and performance of undergraduate students increases when they perceive a cooperative and supportive educational community. The course syllabus is one of the first opportunities to influence student perception on their educational experience. Literature on syllabi suggests that learner-centered syllabi yield more positive student perceptions of teachers and the course as compared to traditional teacher-centered syllabi. Current research on the impacts of different syllabi constructs within construction education is lacking, and no studies could be found on whether these perceptions translate to student grades. This study used action research to better understand the impact of a learner-centered syllabus vs. a teacher-centered syllabus in an undergraduate construction management program. Student perception, faculty perception and student grades were measured between the learner-centered class and the teacher-centered class. The data was collected from four different classes, split among two courses, and taught by two faculty over the spring 2020 semester. Results suggested that the learner-centered syllabi appeared to motivate student engagement as well as impact both, the first impressions of the instructor and teacher-student relationship. However, it showed no difference in student grades.","PeriodicalId":136179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v5i1.5403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research indicates that retention and performance of undergraduate students increases when they perceive a cooperative and supportive educational community. The course syllabus is one of the first opportunities to influence student perception on their educational experience. Literature on syllabi suggests that learner-centered syllabi yield more positive student perceptions of teachers and the course as compared to traditional teacher-centered syllabi. Current research on the impacts of different syllabi constructs within construction education is lacking, and no studies could be found on whether these perceptions translate to student grades. This study used action research to better understand the impact of a learner-centered syllabus vs. a teacher-centered syllabus in an undergraduate construction management program. Student perception, faculty perception and student grades were measured between the learner-centered class and the teacher-centered class. The data was collected from four different classes, split among two courses, and taught by two faculty over the spring 2020 semester. Results suggested that the learner-centered syllabi appeared to motivate student engagement as well as impact both, the first impressions of the instructor and teacher-student relationship. However, it showed no difference in student grades.
建筑管理课程中以学习者为中心与以教师为中心的教学大纲评价:初步调查
研究表明,当大学生感受到一个合作和支持的教育社区时,他们的保留率和表现都会提高。课程大纲是影响学生对其教育经历的看法的第一个机会。关于教学大纲的文献表明,与传统的以教师为中心的教学大纲相比,以学生为中心的教学大纲使学生对教师和课程产生更积极的看法。目前关于不同教学大纲结构对建构教育的影响的研究还很缺乏,也没有研究发现这些观念是否会转化为学生的成绩。本研究采用行动研究的方法来了解以学习者为中心的教学大纲与以教师为中心的教学大纲在本科建筑管理专业的影响。在以学习者为中心的班级和以教师为中心的班级之间,测量了学生感知、教师感知和学生成绩。这些数据是从四个不同的班级收集的,分为两门课程,由两名教师在2020年春季学期教授。结果表明,以学习者为中心的教学大纲似乎可以激发学生的参与,并影响教师的第一印象和师生关系。然而,它没有显示出学生成绩的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信