Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in St. Luke’s Medical Center: 10-Year Local Experience and Response Rates

M. Cruz-Ordinario, May Rose A. Malesido, May N. Sabando, A. Gorospe, C. Dy
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in St. Luke’s Medical Center: 10-Year Local Experience and Response Rates","authors":"M. Cruz-Ordinario, May Rose A. Malesido, May N. Sabando, A. Gorospe, C. Dy","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.1.3-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has given important prognostic and predictive information based on pathologic response as seen on studies showing that pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with favorable disease-free and overall survival in some molecular subtypes. The main objective is to determine the pCR rate among patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) in our institution. Method: A total of 259 patients with LABC who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent definitive surgery at St. Luke’s Medical Center Quezon City from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed through chart review. Results: Patients’ median age at diagnosis was 51 years old. 57% were premenopausal and 42% were postmenopausal. The most common histology was Invasive Ductal at 92%. The most common subtype was Luminal/HER2 negative (52%). Majority of the patients have Stage III disease. The most common chemotherapy regimen used was sequential Anthracycline and Taxane (AC/EC/FEC then Taxane with or without Trastuzumab and Docetaxel with or without Trastuzumab followed by FEC) at 31%, Anthracycline-based (Doxorubicin or Epirubicin with Cyclophosphamide/5FU -EC/ AC/FAC) at 28%, and concurrent Anthracycline-based and Taxane (TAC/AT/ET) at 27%. Of the 95 patients with Her 2 positive disease, 21 (22%) received anti-Her2 blockade as part of their neoadjuvant regimen. The pCR, defined as absence of invasive residual cancer in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, with or without ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) was seen in 46 patients (18%). Among the patients who achieved pCR, the most common subtype is Luminal/HER2 negative at 17% and the most common regimen used was Docetaxel followed by FEC (5FU+EC) at39%. Conclusion: Among 259 patients, pCR is achieved in 18% of patients using standard chemotherapy. This study shows that the most common neoadjuvant regimen used was sequential Anthracycline and Taxane and most common subtype is Luminal/Her negative.","PeriodicalId":436394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.1.3-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has given important prognostic and predictive information based on pathologic response as seen on studies showing that pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with favorable disease-free and overall survival in some molecular subtypes. The main objective is to determine the pCR rate among patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) in our institution. Method: A total of 259 patients with LABC who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent definitive surgery at St. Luke’s Medical Center Quezon City from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed through chart review. Results: Patients’ median age at diagnosis was 51 years old. 57% were premenopausal and 42% were postmenopausal. The most common histology was Invasive Ductal at 92%. The most common subtype was Luminal/HER2 negative (52%). Majority of the patients have Stage III disease. The most common chemotherapy regimen used was sequential Anthracycline and Taxane (AC/EC/FEC then Taxane with or without Trastuzumab and Docetaxel with or without Trastuzumab followed by FEC) at 31%, Anthracycline-based (Doxorubicin or Epirubicin with Cyclophosphamide/5FU -EC/ AC/FAC) at 28%, and concurrent Anthracycline-based and Taxane (TAC/AT/ET) at 27%. Of the 95 patients with Her 2 positive disease, 21 (22%) received anti-Her2 blockade as part of their neoadjuvant regimen. The pCR, defined as absence of invasive residual cancer in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, with or without ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) was seen in 46 patients (18%). Among the patients who achieved pCR, the most common subtype is Luminal/HER2 negative at 17% and the most common regimen used was Docetaxel followed by FEC (5FU+EC) at39%. Conclusion: Among 259 patients, pCR is achieved in 18% of patients using standard chemotherapy. This study shows that the most common neoadjuvant regimen used was sequential Anthracycline and Taxane and most common subtype is Luminal/Her negative.
圣路加医疗中心局部晚期乳腺癌的新辅助全身治疗:10年当地经验和反应率
研究表明,病理完全缓解(pCR)与某些分子亚型的良好无病生存和总生存相关,新辅助治疗基于病理反应提供了重要的预后和预测信息。主要目的是确定本机构局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)患者的pCR率。方法:回顾性分析2007 - 2017年在奎松市圣路加医疗中心接受新辅助治疗并最终手术的259例LABC患者。结果:患者诊断时的中位年龄为51岁。57%为绝经前,42%为绝经后。最常见的组织学为浸润性导管,占92%。最常见的亚型为Luminal/HER2阴性(52%)。大多数患者为III期。最常见的化疗方案是序贯蒽环类和紫杉烷(AC/EC/FEC,然后紫杉烷加或不加曲妥珠单抗,多西他赛加或不加曲妥珠单抗,然后FEC)占31%,蒽环类(阿霉素或表柔比星加环磷酰胺/5FU -EC/ AC/FAC)占28%,蒽环类和紫杉烷(TAC/ at /ET)同时使用占27%。在95例her2阳性疾病患者中,21例(22%)接受了抗her2阻断治疗作为其新辅助治疗方案的一部分。pCR定义为乳腺和腋窝淋巴结中没有浸润性残留癌,伴或不伴原位导管癌(DCIS),在46例(18%)患者中可见。在实现pCR的患者中,最常见的亚型是Luminal/HER2阴性,占17%,最常见的方案是多西他赛,其次是FEC (5FU+EC),占39%。结论:259例患者中,18%采用标准化疗的患者实现了pCR。本研究显示,最常见的新辅助方案是序贯蒽环类药物和紫杉烷,最常见的亚型是Luminal/Her阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信