Micro-História e Psicanálise: Ginzburg discute o caso clínico Homem dos Lobos de Sigmund Freud

R. M. Gomes
{"title":"Micro-História e Psicanálise: Ginzburg discute o caso clínico Homem dos Lobos de Sigmund Freud","authors":"R. M. Gomes","doi":"10.23925/1980-7651.2019v24;p83-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In search of a fruitful relationship between Psychoanalysis and History, this article aims to evaluate how Carlo Ginzburg, throughout his intellectual and academic career, discussed Psychoanalysis in the light of Micro-History. Thus, the work of Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história was a rich source for this search. In the chapters Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário and, especially, Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens, Ginzburg critically discusses Freud`s interpretations on his most important clinical case, a Russian patient named Serguei Constantinovitch Pankejeff (1887-1979), known as the Wolf man. Ginzburg recognizes the magnitude of Freud’s work, but he shows its limitations indicating that the author did not sufficiently consider his patient’s cultural background and gave a greater focus on individuation. Also, Ginzburg allowed demonstrating in his work the importance of Psychoanalysis in the development of the evidentiary paradigm concept, which is fundamental to Micro-history.","PeriodicalId":366399,"journal":{"name":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/1980-7651.2019v24;p83-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In search of a fruitful relationship between Psychoanalysis and History, this article aims to evaluate how Carlo Ginzburg, throughout his intellectual and academic career, discussed Psychoanalysis in the light of Micro-History. Thus, the work of Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história was a rich source for this search. In the chapters Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário and, especially, Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens, Ginzburg critically discusses Freud`s interpretations on his most important clinical case, a Russian patient named Serguei Constantinovitch Pankejeff (1887-1979), known as the Wolf man. Ginzburg recognizes the magnitude of Freud’s work, but he shows its limitations indicating that the author did not sufficiently consider his patient’s cultural background and gave a greater focus on individuation. Also, Ginzburg allowed demonstrating in his work the importance of Psychoanalysis in the development of the evidentiary paradigm concept, which is fundamental to Micro-history.
微观历史与精神分析:金兹堡讨论西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的狼人临床案例
为了寻找精神分析和历史之间富有成效的关系,本文旨在评估卡洛·金兹堡在他的整个智力和学术生涯中是如何从微观历史的角度来讨论精神分析的。因此,Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história的工作为这项研究提供了丰富的资源。在《Sinais: raízes de um范式indiciário》和《Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens》两章中,金兹伯格批判性地讨论了弗洛伊德对他最重要的临床病例的解释,这是一个名叫谢尔盖·康斯坦丁诺维奇·潘克杰夫(1887-1979)的俄罗斯病人,被称为狼人。金兹伯格认识到弗洛伊德工作的重要性,但他指出了其局限性,表明作者没有充分考虑病人的文化背景,而是更注重个性化。此外,金兹伯格在他的作品中证明了精神分析在证据范式概念发展中的重要性,这是微观历史的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信