{"title":"Micro-História e Psicanálise: Ginzburg discute o caso clínico Homem dos Lobos de Sigmund Freud","authors":"R. M. Gomes","doi":"10.23925/1980-7651.2019v24;p83-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In search of a fruitful relationship between Psychoanalysis and History, this article aims to evaluate how Carlo Ginzburg, throughout his intellectual and academic career, discussed Psychoanalysis in the light of Micro-History. Thus, the work of Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história was a rich source for this search. In the chapters Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário and, especially, Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens, Ginzburg critically discusses Freud`s interpretations on his most important clinical case, a Russian patient named Serguei Constantinovitch Pankejeff (1887-1979), known as the Wolf man. Ginzburg recognizes the magnitude of Freud’s work, but he shows its limitations indicating that the author did not sufficiently consider his patient’s cultural background and gave a greater focus on individuation. Also, Ginzburg allowed demonstrating in his work the importance of Psychoanalysis in the development of the evidentiary paradigm concept, which is fundamental to Micro-history.","PeriodicalId":366399,"journal":{"name":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/1980-7651.2019v24;p83-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In search of a fruitful relationship between Psychoanalysis and History, this article aims to evaluate how Carlo Ginzburg, throughout his intellectual and academic career, discussed Psychoanalysis in the light of Micro-History. Thus, the work of Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história was a rich source for this search. In the chapters Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário and, especially, Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens, Ginzburg critically discusses Freud`s interpretations on his most important clinical case, a Russian patient named Serguei Constantinovitch Pankejeff (1887-1979), known as the Wolf man. Ginzburg recognizes the magnitude of Freud’s work, but he shows its limitations indicating that the author did not sufficiently consider his patient’s cultural background and gave a greater focus on individuation. Also, Ginzburg allowed demonstrating in his work the importance of Psychoanalysis in the development of the evidentiary paradigm concept, which is fundamental to Micro-history.
为了寻找精神分析和历史之间富有成效的关系,本文旨在评估卡洛·金兹堡在他的整个智力和学术生涯中是如何从微观历史的角度来讨论精神分析的。因此,Ginzburg Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história的工作为这项研究提供了丰富的资源。在《Sinais: raízes de um范式indiciário》和《Freud, o homem dos lobos e os lobisomens》两章中,金兹伯格批判性地讨论了弗洛伊德对他最重要的临床病例的解释,这是一个名叫谢尔盖·康斯坦丁诺维奇·潘克杰夫(1887-1979)的俄罗斯病人,被称为狼人。金兹伯格认识到弗洛伊德工作的重要性,但他指出了其局限性,表明作者没有充分考虑病人的文化背景,而是更注重个性化。此外,金兹伯格在他的作品中证明了精神分析在证据范式概念发展中的重要性,这是微观历史的基础。