Eating or Meeting? The Dubious Case for Free School Breakfasts

T. Kealey
{"title":"Eating or Meeting? The Dubious Case for Free School Breakfasts","authors":"T. Kealey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Conservative Party’s manifesto for the June 2017 general election included a policy to replace free school lunches with free school breakfasts for all school children. After the election, the policy was abandoned. The Conservative manifesto justified the policy by appealing to research into the educational effects of free school breakfasts conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in 2016. This research was conducted to a high standard. However, the widespread interpretation of the findings was incorrect. The research does not show that school breakfasts are required as a remedy for children arriving at school hungry. Nor did it show that the improved educational performance of the children involved in the study was the result of eating breakfast. The findings of this research, and previous studies, strongly suggest that it is the social element of these school clubs, not the nutritional element, that explains improved educational performance. Misrepresenting the findings as identifying nutritional rather than social factors in educational performance is likely to misdirect public policy, not only concerning education but concerning children’s health. The main nutritional problem in children from poor British families is not hunger but over-eating and obesity.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Conservative Party’s manifesto for the June 2017 general election included a policy to replace free school lunches with free school breakfasts for all school children. After the election, the policy was abandoned. The Conservative manifesto justified the policy by appealing to research into the educational effects of free school breakfasts conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in 2016. This research was conducted to a high standard. However, the widespread interpretation of the findings was incorrect. The research does not show that school breakfasts are required as a remedy for children arriving at school hungry. Nor did it show that the improved educational performance of the children involved in the study was the result of eating breakfast. The findings of this research, and previous studies, strongly suggest that it is the social element of these school clubs, not the nutritional element, that explains improved educational performance. Misrepresenting the findings as identifying nutritional rather than social factors in educational performance is likely to misdirect public policy, not only concerning education but concerning children’s health. The main nutritional problem in children from poor British families is not hunger but over-eating and obesity.
吃饭还是开会?学校免费早餐的可疑案例
保守党在2017年6月大选的宣言中包括了一项政策,即为所有学生提供免费学校午餐,而不是免费学校早餐。选举之后,这项政策被放弃了。保守党的宣言通过呼吁财政研究所(Institute for Fiscal Studies)在2016年对免费学校早餐的教育效果进行研究来为这项政策辩护。这项研究是高标准进行的。然而,对这些发现的普遍解读是不正确的。这项研究并没有表明学校早餐是孩子们饿着肚子上学的必要补救措施。研究也没有表明,参与研究的儿童的学习成绩的提高是吃早餐的结果。这项研究的结果,以及之前的研究,强烈地表明,是这些学校俱乐部的社会因素,而不是营养因素,解释了教育成绩的提高。将调查结果歪曲为确定教育成绩中的营养因素而不是社会因素,可能会误导不仅涉及教育而且涉及儿童健康的公共政策。英国贫困家庭儿童的主要营养问题不是饥饿,而是暴饮暴食和肥胖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信