Models of Social Enterprise in South Korea

E. Bidet, Hyungsik Eum, Jieun Ryu
{"title":"Models of Social Enterprise in South Korea","authors":"E. Bidet, Hyungsik Eum, Jieun Ryu","doi":"10.4324/9780429265761-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the absence of a widely accepted and common definition of social enterprise (SE), a large research project, the \"International Comparative Social Enterprise Models\" (ICSEM) Project, was carried out over a five-year period; it involved more than 200 researchers from 55 countries and relied on bottom-up approaches to capture the SE phenomenon. This strategy made it possible to take into account and give legitimacy to locally embedded approaches, thus resulting in an analysis encompassing a wide diversity of social enterprises, while simultaneously allowing for the identification of major SE models to delineate the field on common grounds at the international level. These SE models reveal or confirm an overall trend towards new ways of sharing the responsibility for the common good in today’s economies and societies. We tend to consider as good news the fact that social enterprises actually stem from all parts of the economy. Indeed, societies are facing many complex challenges at all levels, from the local to the global level. The diversity and internal variety of SE models are a sign of a broadly shared willingness to develop appropriate―although sometimes embryonic―responses to these challenges, on the basis of innovative economic/business models driven by a social mission. In spite of their weaknesses, social enterprises may be seen as advocates for and vehicles of the general interest across the whole economy. Of course, the debate about privatisation, deregulation and globalised market competition―all factors that may hinder efforts in the search for the common good–has to be addressed as well. The first of a series of four ICSEM books, Social Enterprise in Asia will serve as a key reference and resource for teachers, researchers, students, experts, policy makers, journalists and other categories of people who want to acquire a broad understanding of the phenomena of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship as they emerge and develop across the world.","PeriodicalId":185692,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise in Asia","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429265761-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the absence of a widely accepted and common definition of social enterprise (SE), a large research project, the "International Comparative Social Enterprise Models" (ICSEM) Project, was carried out over a five-year period; it involved more than 200 researchers from 55 countries and relied on bottom-up approaches to capture the SE phenomenon. This strategy made it possible to take into account and give legitimacy to locally embedded approaches, thus resulting in an analysis encompassing a wide diversity of social enterprises, while simultaneously allowing for the identification of major SE models to delineate the field on common grounds at the international level. These SE models reveal or confirm an overall trend towards new ways of sharing the responsibility for the common good in today’s economies and societies. We tend to consider as good news the fact that social enterprises actually stem from all parts of the economy. Indeed, societies are facing many complex challenges at all levels, from the local to the global level. The diversity and internal variety of SE models are a sign of a broadly shared willingness to develop appropriate―although sometimes embryonic―responses to these challenges, on the basis of innovative economic/business models driven by a social mission. In spite of their weaknesses, social enterprises may be seen as advocates for and vehicles of the general interest across the whole economy. Of course, the debate about privatisation, deregulation and globalised market competition―all factors that may hinder efforts in the search for the common good–has to be addressed as well. The first of a series of four ICSEM books, Social Enterprise in Asia will serve as a key reference and resource for teachers, researchers, students, experts, policy makers, journalists and other categories of people who want to acquire a broad understanding of the phenomena of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship as they emerge and develop across the world.
韩国社会企业的模式
由于社会企业没有一个被广泛接受和共同的定义,因此进行了一项为期五年的大型研究项目“国际比较社会企业模式”(ICSEM)项目;它涉及来自55个国家的200多名研究人员,依靠自下而上的方法来捕捉SE现象。这一战略使得考虑到本地嵌入的方法并赋予其合法性成为可能,从而产生了一种包含广泛的社会企业多样性的分析,同时允许识别主要的社会企业模式,以在国际层面上共同描述该领域。这些SE模型揭示或证实了一种总体趋势,即在当今的经济和社会中,以新的方式分担共同利益的责任。我们倾向于认为,社会企业实际上源于经济的各个方面,这是一个好消息。的确,社会在从地方到全球各级都面临着许多复杂的挑战。社会企业模式的多样性和内部多样性表明,在社会使命驱动下的创新经济/商业模式的基础上,人们普遍愿意开发适当的(尽管有时是初步的)应对这些挑战的方法。尽管社会企业有其弱点,但它们可以被视为整个经济中普遍利益的倡导者和载体。当然,关于私有化、放松管制和全球化市场竞争的争论——所有这些因素都可能阻碍寻求共同利益的努力——也必须得到解决。作为ICSEM四本系列丛书中的第一本,《亚洲社会企业》将为教师、研究人员、学生、专家、政策制定者、记者和其他想要广泛了解社会企业和社会企业家精神在世界各地出现和发展的人提供重要的参考和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信