The morphological response of Emiliania huxleyi to seawater carbonate chemistry changes: an inter-strain comparison.

G. Langer, I. Probert, G. Nehrke, P. Ziveri
{"title":"The morphological response of Emiliania huxleyi to seawater carbonate chemistry changes: an inter-strain comparison.","authors":"G. Langer, I. Probert, G. Nehrke, P. Ziveri","doi":"10.1594/PANGAEA.826456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four strains of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (RCC1212, RCC1216, RCC1238, RCC1256) were grown in dilute batch culture at four CO 2 levels ranging from ~200 µatm to ~1200 µatm. Coccolith morphology was analyzed based on scanning electron micrographs. Three of the four strains did not exhibit a change in morphol- ogy over the CO 2 range tested. One strain (RCC1256) displayed an increase in the percentage of malformed coccoliths with increasing CO 2 concentration. We conclude that the sensitivity of the coccolith-shaping machinery to carbonate chemistry changes is strain-specific. Although it has been shown before that carbonate chemistry related changes in growth- and calcification rate are strain-specific, there seems to be no consistent correlation between coccolith mor - phology and growth or calcification rate. We did not observe an increase in the percentage of incomplete coccoliths in RCC1256, indicating that the coccolith-shaping machinery per se is affected by acidification and not the signalling pathway that produces the stop-signal for coccolith growth.","PeriodicalId":186533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nannoplankton Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nannoplankton Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.826456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Four strains of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (RCC1212, RCC1216, RCC1238, RCC1256) were grown in dilute batch culture at four CO 2 levels ranging from ~200 µatm to ~1200 µatm. Coccolith morphology was analyzed based on scanning electron micrographs. Three of the four strains did not exhibit a change in morphol- ogy over the CO 2 range tested. One strain (RCC1256) displayed an increase in the percentage of malformed coccoliths with increasing CO 2 concentration. We conclude that the sensitivity of the coccolith-shaping machinery to carbonate chemistry changes is strain-specific. Although it has been shown before that carbonate chemistry related changes in growth- and calcification rate are strain-specific, there seems to be no consistent correlation between coccolith mor - phology and growth or calcification rate. We did not observe an increase in the percentage of incomplete coccoliths in RCC1256, indicating that the coccolith-shaping machinery per se is affected by acidification and not the signalling pathway that produces the stop-signal for coccolith growth.
赫胥黎Emiliania huxleyi对海水碳酸盐化学变化的形态响应:种间比较。
在~200µm ~ ~1200µm的4种CO 2水平下,对4株球石藻(Emiliania huxleyi, RCC1212, RCC1216, RCC1238, RCC1256)进行了稀释分批培养。利用扫描电镜对球粒形貌进行了分析。四个菌株中的三个在测试的二氧化碳范围内没有表现出形态变化。其中一个菌株(RCC1256)显示,随着co2浓度的增加,畸形球粒的百分比增加。我们得出结论,球粒形成机制对碳酸盐化学变化的敏感性是菌株特异性的。虽然之前已经有研究表明碳酸盐化学相关的生长和钙化速率变化是菌株特异性的,但似乎并没有一致的相关性在球粒的生长和钙化速率之间。我们没有观察到RCC1256中不完整球粒百分比的增加,这表明球粒形成机制本身受到酸化的影响,而不是产生停止球粒生长信号的信号通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信