Reimagining Children’s Rights through the Prism of Sustainable Development

Julie M. Davis
{"title":"Reimagining Children’s Rights through the Prism of Sustainable Development","authors":"Julie M. Davis","doi":"10.1017/9781108140348.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concepts of social justice and children’s rights have been familiar companions to many education theorists, researchers and practitioners, particularly in early education, over long periods of time. Indeed, the majority of the literature often valorizes these concepts because of the important contributions of children’s rights research as a driving force for the upgrading of the status of children in society. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) in particular, has been placed at the absolute centre of discussions often framing and/or motivating theory, research or practice. Rarely though is the UNCRC the actual object of analysis or discussion. Instead “it has been allowed to define rights for children”. Like some researchers, for example Veerman, I argue that the UNCRC is outdated; reflective of the image of the child and societies of the drafting period. Things have changed since then. We live in times of increasing insecurity and uncertainty where calls for the world’s peoples to live more socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable lives are becoming more urgent. The UNICEF report, Sustainable Development Starts and Ends with Safe, Healthy and Well-Educated Children, for example, states that it is increasingly recognised that a sustainable world requires a significant shift in awareness, values and practices in order to change our currently unsustainable patterns of consumption and production. This same report argues that children’s needs and rights are interdependent with sustainable development. \n \nEducation holds the key to the necessary shifts in thinking, values and practice required for these transitions. However, the foundations of much of our current discourses about children, education, and social issues are outdated. My starting point in this chapter is that the UNCRC is an historical and political artifact, requiring interrogation and updating, and not a document that sets children’s rights “in stone”. Instead, this chapter argues for a multidimensional rights approach that recognizes collective, intergenerational and bio-centric rights and this reframing has implications for how we 'do' education for children and young people.","PeriodicalId":312220,"journal":{"name":"Children's Rights and Sustainable Development","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children's Rights and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108140348.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Concepts of social justice and children’s rights have been familiar companions to many education theorists, researchers and practitioners, particularly in early education, over long periods of time. Indeed, the majority of the literature often valorizes these concepts because of the important contributions of children’s rights research as a driving force for the upgrading of the status of children in society. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) in particular, has been placed at the absolute centre of discussions often framing and/or motivating theory, research or practice. Rarely though is the UNCRC the actual object of analysis or discussion. Instead “it has been allowed to define rights for children”. Like some researchers, for example Veerman, I argue that the UNCRC is outdated; reflective of the image of the child and societies of the drafting period. Things have changed since then. We live in times of increasing insecurity and uncertainty where calls for the world’s peoples to live more socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable lives are becoming more urgent. The UNICEF report, Sustainable Development Starts and Ends with Safe, Healthy and Well-Educated Children, for example, states that it is increasingly recognised that a sustainable world requires a significant shift in awareness, values and practices in order to change our currently unsustainable patterns of consumption and production. This same report argues that children’s needs and rights are interdependent with sustainable development. Education holds the key to the necessary shifts in thinking, values and practice required for these transitions. However, the foundations of much of our current discourses about children, education, and social issues are outdated. My starting point in this chapter is that the UNCRC is an historical and political artifact, requiring interrogation and updating, and not a document that sets children’s rights “in stone”. Instead, this chapter argues for a multidimensional rights approach that recognizes collective, intergenerational and bio-centric rights and this reframing has implications for how we 'do' education for children and young people.
从可持续发展的角度重新构想儿童权利
长期以来,社会正义和儿童权利的概念一直是许多教育理论家、研究人员和实践者所熟悉的伙伴,特别是在早期教育方面。事实上,大多数文献经常对这些概念进行评价,因为儿童权利研究作为提高儿童在社会中的地位的推动力作出了重要贡献。特别是《联合国儿童权利公约》(《儿童权利公约》)已被置于讨论的绝对中心,往往构成和/或推动理论、研究或实践。然而,《联合国儿童权利公约》很少成为分析或讨论的实际对象。相反,“它被允许界定儿童的权利”。和一些研究人员一样,比如维尔曼,我认为《联合国儿童权利公约》已经过时了;反映了起草时期儿童和社会的形象。从那时起,情况发生了变化。我们生活在一个越来越不安全和不确定的时代,要求世界各国人民在社会、经济和环境方面过上更加可持续的生活的呼声变得越来越迫切。例如,儿童基金会的报告《可持续发展以安全、健康和受过良好教育的儿童为始和终》指出,人们日益认识到,一个可持续的世界需要在认识、价值观和做法方面作出重大转变,以便改变我们目前不可持续的消费和生产模式。同一份报告还认为,儿童的需要和权利与可持续发展是相互依存的。教育是实现这些转变所需的思想、价值观和实践转变的关键。然而,我们目前关于儿童、教育和社会问题的许多论述的基础已经过时了。我在这一章的出发点是,《联合国儿童权利公约》是一个历史和政治产物,需要审讯和更新,而不是一份将儿童权利“板上钉钉”的文件。相反,本章主张采用一种多维权利方法,承认集体、代际和以生物为中心的权利,这种重新定义对我们如何“开展”儿童和青年教育具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信