A Comparison of the Physico-Chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Greywater from Water Deficient Households in Homabay Town and Githurai Estates in Kenya

Victor G. Nganga, F. Kariuki, K. Kotut
{"title":"A Comparison of the Physico-Chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Greywater from Water Deficient Households in Homabay Town and Githurai Estates in Kenya","authors":"Victor G. Nganga, F. Kariuki, K. Kotut","doi":"10.2174/1874829501205010110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Greywater, the untreated household wastewater that has not been contaminated by toilet waste, has been touted as a reliable all year-round source of water, especially in water scarce areas. Although it is commonly reused in water scarce urban and peri-urban settlements in Kenya, information on its bacteriological and physico-chemical properties is generally limited. The present study sought to compare the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of kitchen and laundry greywater from an urban (Githurai) and peri-urban settlement (Homabay). Compared to the source water, kitchen and laundry greywater at the two sites had higher electrical conductivity (EC) and salinity, depressed dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and a wide pH range. Although significant differences in EC, DO and salinity of greywater from kitchen and laundry were noted (P < 0.05), the two sites differed significantly only in DO (P = 0.002). Total coliforms (TC) and fecal coliforms (FC) were also higher in greywater than in source water. The greywater types differed in TC (P = 0.003) while the two sites differed in both TC and FC (P � 0.03). High loads of TC and FC suggest possible fecal contamination of greywater. This coupled with the occasional presence of Salmonella, Shigella and Vibrio cholerae means that reuse of untreated greywater is not safe in both sites, and should be treated before use. Owing to the differences in the quality of the different types of greywater as well as the sites investigated, the design of greywater treatment technologies should consider both type and source.","PeriodicalId":344616,"journal":{"name":"The Open Environmental Engineering Journal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Environmental Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874829501205010110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Greywater, the untreated household wastewater that has not been contaminated by toilet waste, has been touted as a reliable all year-round source of water, especially in water scarce areas. Although it is commonly reused in water scarce urban and peri-urban settlements in Kenya, information on its bacteriological and physico-chemical properties is generally limited. The present study sought to compare the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of kitchen and laundry greywater from an urban (Githurai) and peri-urban settlement (Homabay). Compared to the source water, kitchen and laundry greywater at the two sites had higher electrical conductivity (EC) and salinity, depressed dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and a wide pH range. Although significant differences in EC, DO and salinity of greywater from kitchen and laundry were noted (P < 0.05), the two sites differed significantly only in DO (P = 0.002). Total coliforms (TC) and fecal coliforms (FC) were also higher in greywater than in source water. The greywater types differed in TC (P = 0.003) while the two sites differed in both TC and FC (P � 0.03). High loads of TC and FC suggest possible fecal contamination of greywater. This coupled with the occasional presence of Salmonella, Shigella and Vibrio cholerae means that reuse of untreated greywater is not safe in both sites, and should be treated before use. Owing to the differences in the quality of the different types of greywater as well as the sites investigated, the design of greywater treatment technologies should consider both type and source.
肯尼亚Homabay镇和Githurai村缺水家庭灰水的理化和细菌质量比较
灰水是一种未经处理的家庭废水,没有受到厕所废物的污染,被吹捧为全年可靠的水源,特别是在缺水地区。虽然它通常在肯尼亚缺水的城市和城郊住区重新使用,但关于其细菌和物理化学性质的资料一般有限。本研究试图比较来自城市(吉图莱)和城郊住区(霍马贝)的厨房和洗衣房灰水的物理化学和细菌质量。与水源水相比,两个地点的厨房和洗衣房灰水的电导率(EC)和盐度更高,溶解氧(DO)水平较低,pH范围较宽。厨房和洗衣房灰水的EC、DO和盐度差异显著(P < 0.05),但只有DO差异显著(P = 0.002)。灰水中总大肠菌群(TC)和粪便大肠菌群(FC)均高于水源水。灰水类型在TC上存在差异(P = 0.003),而在TC和FC上存在差异(P = 0.03)。高负荷的TC和FC表明灰水可能受到粪便污染。再加上偶尔出现沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌和霍乱弧菌,这意味着在这两个地点重复使用未经处理的灰水是不安全的,在使用前应进行处理。由于不同类型的灰水的水质以及所调查的场地存在差异,因此在设计灰水处理技术时应同时考虑类型和来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信