Hybrid workplace: current status, positives, negatives, challenges, and team learning

Emmanuel Oppong Peprah
{"title":"Hybrid workplace: current status, positives, negatives, challenges, and team learning","authors":"Emmanuel Oppong Peprah","doi":"10.1108/tlo-11-2022-0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to find out if organizations are still practicing a hybrid workplace arrangement after COVID-19 ease of restrictions, determine the positive and negative sides of a hybrid workplace, ascertain the challenges organizations are currently facing in implementing a hybrid workplace and examine how successful team learning has been in hybrid workplaces.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopted a mixed approach. Two sets of data (quantitative and qualitative) were used to answer the research questions.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that most organizations within professional service firms are still implementing hybrid workplaces even though COVID-19 restrictions have been eased. This study also found that one of the advantages of implementing a hybrid work arrangement includes employees’ opportunity to spend more time with their families. On the other hand, the disadvantages discovered were gradual loss of corporate identity, a feeling of loneliness and others. One of the challenges organizations are facing in implementing this working system is the lack of an ergonomic workplace and appropriate technology for remote working. With evidence, this study ends with finding out that companies are not successful as expected in terms of team learning in a hybrid workplace.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is among the first to look at hybrid workplace in the African setting where COVID restrictions which highlights the practice has not really been an issue. This study also combines its findings with those done on the subject before to firmly clarify attributes as they exist.\n","PeriodicalId":365387,"journal":{"name":"The Learning Organization","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Learning Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-11-2022-0150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to find out if organizations are still practicing a hybrid workplace arrangement after COVID-19 ease of restrictions, determine the positive and negative sides of a hybrid workplace, ascertain the challenges organizations are currently facing in implementing a hybrid workplace and examine how successful team learning has been in hybrid workplaces. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a mixed approach. Two sets of data (quantitative and qualitative) were used to answer the research questions. Findings This study found that most organizations within professional service firms are still implementing hybrid workplaces even though COVID-19 restrictions have been eased. This study also found that one of the advantages of implementing a hybrid work arrangement includes employees’ opportunity to spend more time with their families. On the other hand, the disadvantages discovered were gradual loss of corporate identity, a feeling of loneliness and others. One of the challenges organizations are facing in implementing this working system is the lack of an ergonomic workplace and appropriate technology for remote working. With evidence, this study ends with finding out that companies are not successful as expected in terms of team learning in a hybrid workplace. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is among the first to look at hybrid workplace in the African setting where COVID restrictions which highlights the practice has not really been an issue. This study also combines its findings with those done on the subject before to firmly clarify attributes as they exist.
混合型工作场所:现状、积极因素、消极因素、挑战和团队学习
本研究旨在了解在COVID-19放宽限制后,组织是否仍在实施混合工作场所安排,确定混合工作场所的积极和消极方面,确定组织目前在实施混合工作场所时面临的挑战,并研究团队学习在混合工作场所的成功程度。设计/方法/方法本研究采用混合方法。两组数据(定量和定性)被用来回答研究问题。这项研究发现,尽管COVID-19限制已经放松,但专业服务公司内的大多数组织仍在实施混合工作场所。这项研究还发现,实施混合工作安排的一个好处是,员工有机会花更多的时间与家人在一起。另一方面,发现的缺点是企业身份的逐渐丧失,孤独感和其他。组织在实施这种工作系统时面临的挑战之一是缺乏符合人体工程学的工作场所和适合远程工作的技术。有了证据,本研究最后发现,在混合工作场所的团队学习方面,公司并没有像预期的那样成功。据作者所知,这是第一批研究非洲环境中混合工作场所的研究之一,在非洲,COVID限制强调了这种做法并不是一个真正的问题。这项研究还将其发现与之前的研究结果相结合,以明确属性的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信