{"title":"Vaginal cuff closure at total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): Laparoscopic suturing versus vaginal closure","authors":"S. Karunananda","doi":"10.4038/SLJOG.V43I1.7978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), is fast replacing the conventional open procedure where and when feasible with greater public awareness and demand. Lesser disastrous major complications and affordability will help towards this trend in making it more popular. Any measures to improve and simplify and speed up this procedure demanding a higher level of skill, should be welcome. A total number of 62 TLH procedures, performed at the Teaching Hospital Peradeniya were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and analysed to see the speed and complications related to the method of vaginal cuff closure.Twenty six (42%) TLH procedures were done entirely trans abdominally with the laparoscope (A), and the rest 36 (58)% had the cuff closed manually, through vaginal approach (V). Complications directly attributable to surgery on the closure of the vaginal cuff itself were much higher with the abdominal technique-6 (23%) instances; but only 3 (8.3%) in the vaginal approach. The average vaginal closure time was over 3 times faster vaginally (19 vs 5.5min) with a lesser complication rate,making it the personal preference of the author as the research progressed explaining the higher proportion of vaginal closures.","PeriodicalId":186118,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJOG.V43I1.7978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), is fast replacing the conventional open procedure where and when feasible with greater public awareness and demand. Lesser disastrous major complications and affordability will help towards this trend in making it more popular. Any measures to improve and simplify and speed up this procedure demanding a higher level of skill, should be welcome. A total number of 62 TLH procedures, performed at the Teaching Hospital Peradeniya were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and analysed to see the speed and complications related to the method of vaginal cuff closure.Twenty six (42%) TLH procedures were done entirely trans abdominally with the laparoscope (A), and the rest 36 (58)% had the cuff closed manually, through vaginal approach (V). Complications directly attributable to surgery on the closure of the vaginal cuff itself were much higher with the abdominal technique-6 (23%) instances; but only 3 (8.3%) in the vaginal approach. The average vaginal closure time was over 3 times faster vaginally (19 vs 5.5min) with a lesser complication rate,making it the personal preference of the author as the research progressed explaining the higher proportion of vaginal closures.
随着公众意识和需求的提高,腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)正在迅速取代传统的开放式手术。更少的灾难性重大并发症和可负担性将有助于这一趋势,使其更受欢迎。任何改进、简化和加快这一程序的措施都需要更高水平的技能,都应该受到欢迎。在Peradeniya教学医院进行的总共62例TLH手术进行了至少4个月的随访,并分析了与阴道袖带闭合方法相关的速度和并发症。26例(42%)TLH手术完全经腹部腹腔镜(A)完成,其余36例(58%)通过阴道入路手动关闭阴道袖带(V)。直接归因于阴道袖带关闭手术本身的并发症在腹部技术中要高得多(6例(23%));但只有3例(8.3%)在阴道入路。阴道闭合的平均时间比阴道闭合快3倍(19 vs 5.5min),并发症发生率较低,这是作者的个人偏好,随着研究的进展,解释了阴道闭合比例较高的原因。