A Comparative Study of the Use of a Robust Color Image Segmentation Method

Rodolfo Alvarado-Cervantes, E. Riverón, Vladislav Khartchenko, O. Pogrebnyak
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Use of a Robust Color Image Segmentation Method","authors":"Rodolfo Alvarado-Cervantes, E. Riverón, Vladislav Khartchenko, O. Pogrebnyak","doi":"10.1109/MICAI-2016.2016.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparative study of some basic close related color image segmentation methods is presented. It is focused in the evaluation of two segmentation methods based on a recently published adaptive color similarity function making use of: 1) pixel samples of both figure and background and classifying by maximum similarity, and 2) pixel samples of only figure and classifying by automatic thresholding thus employing only half of input information. It is also presented for comparison, the results of classification using the Euclidean metric of a* and b* channels rejecting L* in the L*a*b* color space and with the Euclidian metric of the R, G, and B channels in the RGB color space. From the results it was obtained that the segmentation technique using the adaptive color similarity function and classifying by automatic thresholding (employing only half of the information supplied to the other methods) had better performance than those implemented in the L*a*b* and RGB color spaces in all cases of study. The performance is equivalent to that using pixel sample of both figure and background and classifying by maximum similarity. The improvement in quality of the segmentation techniques using the color similarity function is substantially significant.","PeriodicalId":405503,"journal":{"name":"2016 Fifteenth Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI)","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Fifteenth Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICAI-2016.2016.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a comparative study of some basic close related color image segmentation methods is presented. It is focused in the evaluation of two segmentation methods based on a recently published adaptive color similarity function making use of: 1) pixel samples of both figure and background and classifying by maximum similarity, and 2) pixel samples of only figure and classifying by automatic thresholding thus employing only half of input information. It is also presented for comparison, the results of classification using the Euclidean metric of a* and b* channels rejecting L* in the L*a*b* color space and with the Euclidian metric of the R, G, and B channels in the RGB color space. From the results it was obtained that the segmentation technique using the adaptive color similarity function and classifying by automatic thresholding (employing only half of the information supplied to the other methods) had better performance than those implemented in the L*a*b* and RGB color spaces in all cases of study. The performance is equivalent to that using pixel sample of both figure and background and classifying by maximum similarity. The improvement in quality of the segmentation techniques using the color similarity function is substantially significant.
一种鲁棒彩色图像分割方法的比较研究
本文对几种基本的密切相关彩色图像分割方法进行了比较研究。重点评价了基于最近发表的自适应颜色相似函数的两种分割方法:1)图像和背景的像素样本,并根据最大相似度进行分类;2)仅图像的像素样本,并通过自动阈值分类,从而仅使用一半的输入信息。本文还比较了a*和b*通道的欧几里得度量在L*a*b*颜色空间中拒绝L*,以及在RGB颜色空间中拒绝R、G和b通道的欧几里得度量的分类结果。结果表明,采用自适应颜色相似函数和自动阈值分类的分割技术(仅利用其他方法提供的信息的一半)在所有研究情况下都比在L*a*b*和RGB颜色空间中实现的分割技术具有更好的性能。其性能相当于同时使用图像和背景的像素样本,并根据最大相似度进行分类。使用颜色相似函数的分割技术在质量上的改进是非常显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信