Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization in Korea

Seong-Jin Jeong
{"title":"Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization in Korea","authors":"Seong-Jin Jeong","doi":"10.55795/jpc.2022.1.1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Essentially, fiscal decentralization is a matter for the governance, including local governments as well as fiscal authorities. In Korea, whether it is political, bureaucratic, or a matter involving the citizenry, no party truly yearns for fiscal decentralization. Yet, when it comes to every election, one can always hear hollow expressions about fiscal decentralization. This study aims to correct fallacies surrounding the awareness of fiscal decentralization. In South Korea, there has been an awareness that fiscal decentralization is a virtue, and that “20% autonomy” as a rhetorical phrase confuses the fiscal expansion of transferred funds from the central government with fiscal decentralization. Furthermore, balanced development is often confused with fiscal decentralization. If the tax revenue of the local government is over 80%, tax revenue decentralization and expenditure decentralization should be strengthened. If the tax revenue of the local government is under 30%, revenue decentralization should be guaranteed, while expenditure decentralization should be restricted. It is a false doctrine to claim \nthat fiscal decentralization is workable without minimum autonomy and accountability established in local governments. Absent these requirements, fiscal decentralization remains an unattainable mirage. The reinforcement of autonomy and accountability should be the starting point and ultimate goal of a sustainable fiscal operation.","PeriodicalId":211752,"journal":{"name":"Korea Public Choice Association","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Public Choice Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55795/jpc.2022.1.1.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Essentially, fiscal decentralization is a matter for the governance, including local governments as well as fiscal authorities. In Korea, whether it is political, bureaucratic, or a matter involving the citizenry, no party truly yearns for fiscal decentralization. Yet, when it comes to every election, one can always hear hollow expressions about fiscal decentralization. This study aims to correct fallacies surrounding the awareness of fiscal decentralization. In South Korea, there has been an awareness that fiscal decentralization is a virtue, and that “20% autonomy” as a rhetorical phrase confuses the fiscal expansion of transferred funds from the central government with fiscal decentralization. Furthermore, balanced development is often confused with fiscal decentralization. If the tax revenue of the local government is over 80%, tax revenue decentralization and expenditure decentralization should be strengthened. If the tax revenue of the local government is under 30%, revenue decentralization should be guaranteed, while expenditure decentralization should be restricted. It is a false doctrine to claim that fiscal decentralization is workable without minimum autonomy and accountability established in local governments. Absent these requirements, fiscal decentralization remains an unattainable mirage. The reinforcement of autonomy and accountability should be the starting point and ultimate goal of a sustainable fiscal operation.
韩国财政分权的政治经济学
从本质上讲,财政分权是政府的事情,包括地方政府和财政当局。在韩国,无论是政治、官僚还是涉及国民的事务,没有一个政党真正希望财政分权。然而,每次选举都能听到空洞的财政分权论。本研究旨在纠正围绕财政分权意识的谬论。在韩国,人们已经意识到财政分权是一种美德,而“20%的自治权”作为一个修辞词,混淆了中央政府转移资金的财政扩张与财政分权。此外,平衡发展常常与财政分权相混淆。如果地方政府的税收收入超过80%,则应加强税收分权和支出分权。如果地方政府的税收收入低于30%,则应保障收入分权,限制支出分权。在地方政府没有建立最低限度的自主权和问责制的情况下,声称财政分权是可行的,这是一种错误的学说。如果没有这些要求,财政分权仍然是一个无法实现的海市蜃楼。加强自主性和问责制应该是可持续财政运作的出发点和最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信