Party and Faction in Eighteenth-Century Political Thought from Montesquieu to Madison

Max Skjönsberg
{"title":"Party and Faction in Eighteenth-Century Political Thought from Montesquieu to Madison","authors":"Max Skjönsberg","doi":"10.2307/J.CTV1NC6RCB.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses some of the contexts and contents of the European debate about political parties in the eighteenth century, before moving on to delineate some facets of its reception in the early American republic, especially among some of its formative political writers and American presidents, including John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison. Whereas early American political thinkers were eager to avoid the extreme factionalism and partisanship which had been characteristic of Britain, most of them accepted that division was inevitable in politics. In addition to Madison’s familiar appropriation of “Humean” arguments about how to control factionalism in the Tenth Federalist, it is argued that Bolingbroke’s justification for partisan opposition within the party framework merits special attention.","PeriodicalId":315083,"journal":{"name":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV1NC6RCB.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses some of the contexts and contents of the European debate about political parties in the eighteenth century, before moving on to delineate some facets of its reception in the early American republic, especially among some of its formative political writers and American presidents, including John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison. Whereas early American political thinkers were eager to avoid the extreme factionalism and partisanship which had been characteristic of Britain, most of them accepted that division was inevitable in politics. In addition to Madison’s familiar appropriation of “Humean” arguments about how to control factionalism in the Tenth Federalist, it is argued that Bolingbroke’s justification for partisan opposition within the party framework merits special attention.
从孟德斯鸠到麦迪逊十八世纪政治思想中的政党与派系
本章讨论了18世纪欧洲关于政党辩论的一些背景和内容,然后继续描述其在美国共和国早期的一些方面,特别是在一些形成政治作家和美国总统中,包括约翰·亚当斯,托马斯·杰斐逊和詹姆斯·麦迪逊。尽管早期的美国政治思想家渴望避免极端的党派之争和党派之争(这是英国的特征),但他们中的大多数人都承认,政治上的分裂是不可避免的。除了麦迪逊在《联邦党人文集第十篇》中对“休谟”关于如何控制党派之争的论点的熟悉运用之外,还有人认为,博林布鲁克在政党框架内对党派对立的辩护值得特别注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信