The Effectiveness of China’s Anti-Money Laundering Policies

Xujun Tang, Yong Shi, Zuoyi Cao
{"title":"The Effectiveness of China’s Anti-Money Laundering Policies","authors":"Xujun Tang, Yong Shi, Zuoyi Cao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1550532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a controversial issue as to how to assess the effectiveness of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regime on the global arena. Based upon around 9,000 questionnaires circulated to AML professionals and other related staffs at the branches of banking institutions and People’s Bank of China as well, this study has acquired first hand data from respondents, and come up with following key findings. For the effectiveness of the whole AML system, it is rated as “largely effective” in respects to China’s legislation, regulation and supervision, suspicious transaction monitoring and analyses, administrative investigation, yet, it is rated as “basically effective” in respect to money laundering prosecutions and convictions, international cooperation. For the financial intuitions’ compliance with AML regulations, it is rated as “largely effective” in respects to internal control, customer’s identification, large-value transaction and suspicious transaction reporting, the record-keeping of ID information and transactions. Statistically, 58.48% respondents think that the China’s AML regime is “completely effective” or “largely effective”, 35.21% think that it is “basically effective”, with the remaining 4.68% “largely ineffective” or “completely ineffective”. In conclusion, some policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness are proposed.","PeriodicalId":213755,"journal":{"name":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is a controversial issue as to how to assess the effectiveness of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regime on the global arena. Based upon around 9,000 questionnaires circulated to AML professionals and other related staffs at the branches of banking institutions and People’s Bank of China as well, this study has acquired first hand data from respondents, and come up with following key findings. For the effectiveness of the whole AML system, it is rated as “largely effective” in respects to China’s legislation, regulation and supervision, suspicious transaction monitoring and analyses, administrative investigation, yet, it is rated as “basically effective” in respect to money laundering prosecutions and convictions, international cooperation. For the financial intuitions’ compliance with AML regulations, it is rated as “largely effective” in respects to internal control, customer’s identification, large-value transaction and suspicious transaction reporting, the record-keeping of ID information and transactions. Statistically, 58.48% respondents think that the China’s AML regime is “completely effective” or “largely effective”, 35.21% think that it is “basically effective”, with the remaining 4.68% “largely ineffective” or “completely ineffective”. In conclusion, some policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness are proposed.
中国反洗钱政策的有效性
如何在全球范围内评估反洗钱(AML)制度的有效性是一个有争议的问题。本研究通过向各银行机构和中国人民银行分行的“反洗钱”专业人员和其他相关工作人员发放的约9000份问卷,获得了受访者的第一手数据,并得出以下主要发现:对于整个“反洗钱”体系的有效性,在中国的立法、监管和监督、可疑交易监测和分析、行政调查方面被评为“基本有效”,而在洗钱起诉和定罪、国际合作方面被评为“基本有效”。金融机构在遵守“反洗钱”法规方面,在内部控制、客户身份识别、大额交易和可疑交易报告、身份信息和交易记录保存等方面被评为“基本有效”。据统计,58.48%的受访者认为中国的“反洗钱”制度“完全有效”或“基本有效”,35.21%的受访者认为“基本有效”,其余4.68%的受访者认为“基本无效”或“完全无效”。在此基础上,提出了提高政策有效性的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信