Prediction of the Solar Resource through Differences

J. Flores, Baldwin Cortés, J. R. González, A. Morales, H. Rodríguez, Roberto Tapia, F. Calderón
{"title":"Prediction of the Solar Resource through Differences","authors":"J. Flores, Baldwin Cortés, J. R. González, A. Morales, H. Rodríguez, Roberto Tapia, F. Calderón","doi":"10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experience shows that solar resource prediction is a difficult task. The available solar irradiance where a photovoltaic plant is located or is planned to be installed depends mainly on the cloud incidence at the site. This incidence of clouds depends on the climate system of the region, which is well known to be a non-linear, chaotic, and extremely complex, for which there is no exact mathematical model. In fact, the chaos level has been determined for various time series of wind and solar irradiance, and it turns out that the chaos level of the solar time series is greater than that of the wind series. This indicates that the complexity of solar irradiance prediction is considerable. In previous works of solar irradiance prediction, using Artificial Neural Networks, it has been observed that the trained models fail to predict irradiance spikes in conditions of intermittent cloudiness. By conducting a study in this area, we have found that, for a given date, there exist a model to determine the ideal solar irradiance in any geographical location of the planet. These models, so-called clear sky models, have been taken as a reference to predict not the solar irradiance, but the amount of irradiance occluded by the clouds. That is, the difference between ideal irradiance and that measured by the weather station. The proposed model is called SolarDiff, which predicts this difference using Artificial Neural Networks. This article empirically demonstrates that the SolarDiff model exhibits better behavior than models based on direct data. The performance, as in most forecast models, is measured by quantifying the forecast error. In this case the symmetric MAPE error is used.","PeriodicalId":177447,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experience shows that solar resource prediction is a difficult task. The available solar irradiance where a photovoltaic plant is located or is planned to be installed depends mainly on the cloud incidence at the site. This incidence of clouds depends on the climate system of the region, which is well known to be a non-linear, chaotic, and extremely complex, for which there is no exact mathematical model. In fact, the chaos level has been determined for various time series of wind and solar irradiance, and it turns out that the chaos level of the solar time series is greater than that of the wind series. This indicates that the complexity of solar irradiance prediction is considerable. In previous works of solar irradiance prediction, using Artificial Neural Networks, it has been observed that the trained models fail to predict irradiance spikes in conditions of intermittent cloudiness. By conducting a study in this area, we have found that, for a given date, there exist a model to determine the ideal solar irradiance in any geographical location of the planet. These models, so-called clear sky models, have been taken as a reference to predict not the solar irradiance, but the amount of irradiance occluded by the clouds. That is, the difference between ideal irradiance and that measured by the weather station. The proposed model is called SolarDiff, which predicts this difference using Artificial Neural Networks. This article empirically demonstrates that the SolarDiff model exhibits better behavior than models based on direct data. The performance, as in most forecast models, is measured by quantifying the forecast error. In this case the symmetric MAPE error is used.
利用差异预测太阳资源
经验表明,太阳能资源预测是一项艰巨的任务。光伏电站所在或计划安装地点的可用太阳辐照度主要取决于该地点的云层入射情况。云的发生取决于该地区的气候系统,众所周知,气候系统是一个非线性、混沌和极其复杂的系统,没有精确的数学模型。事实上,对风和太阳辐照度的各种时间序列已经确定了混沌水平,太阳时间序列的混沌水平大于风序列。这表明太阳辐照度预测的复杂性是相当大的。在以前使用人工神经网络预测太阳辐照度的工作中,已经观察到训练的模型无法预测间歇性云量条件下的辐照度峰值。通过对这一领域的研究,我们发现,在给定的日期,存在一个模型来确定地球上任何地理位置的理想太阳辐照度。这些模式,即所谓的晴空模式,不是用来预测太阳辐照度,而是用来预测被云层遮挡的辐照度。即理想辐照度与气象站测量的辐照度之间的差值。提出的模型被称为SolarDiff,它使用人工神经网络来预测这种差异。本文通过经验证明,SolarDiff模型比基于直接数据的模型表现出更好的行为。在大多数预测模型中,性能是通过量化预测误差来衡量的。在这种情况下,使用对称MAPE错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信