{"title":"Accountability in Computing: Concepts and Mechanisms","authors":"J. Feigenbaum, A. D. Jaggard, R. Wright","doi":"10.1561/3300000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accountability is a widely studied but amorphous concept, used to mean different things across different disciplines and domains of application. Here, we survey work on accountability in computer science and other disciplines. We motivate our survey with a study of the myriad ways in which the term “accountability” has been used across disciplines and the concepts that play key roles in defining it. This leads us to identify a temporal spectrum onto which we may place different notions of accountability to facilitate their comparison. We then survey accountability mechanisms for different application domains in computer science and place them on our spectrum. Building on this broader survey, we review frameworks and languages for studying accountability in computer science. Finally, we offer conclusions, open questions, and future directions. Joan Feigenbaum, Aaron D. Jaggard and Rebecca N. Wright (2020), “Accountability in Computing: Concepts and Mechanisms”, Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security: Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 247–399. DOI: 10.1561/3300000002. Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/3300000002","PeriodicalId":427727,"journal":{"name":"Found. Trends Priv. Secur.","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Found. Trends Priv. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/3300000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Accountability is a widely studied but amorphous concept, used to mean different things across different disciplines and domains of application. Here, we survey work on accountability in computer science and other disciplines. We motivate our survey with a study of the myriad ways in which the term “accountability” has been used across disciplines and the concepts that play key roles in defining it. This leads us to identify a temporal spectrum onto which we may place different notions of accountability to facilitate their comparison. We then survey accountability mechanisms for different application domains in computer science and place them on our spectrum. Building on this broader survey, we review frameworks and languages for studying accountability in computer science. Finally, we offer conclusions, open questions, and future directions. Joan Feigenbaum, Aaron D. Jaggard and Rebecca N. Wright (2020), “Accountability in Computing: Concepts and Mechanisms”, Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security: Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 247–399. DOI: 10.1561/3300000002. Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/3300000002
问责制是一个被广泛研究但没有定形的概念,在不同的学科和应用领域被用来表示不同的东西。在这里,我们调查了计算机科学和其他学科中关于问责制的工作。我们通过研究“问责制”一词在各个学科中使用的无数种方式,以及在定义“问责制”时发挥关键作用的概念,来激发我们的调查。这导致我们确定一个时间范围,我们可以将不同的问责制概念置于其上,以促进它们的比较。然后,我们调查了计算机科学中不同应用领域的问责机制,并将它们置于我们的范围内。在此基础上,我们回顾了计算机科学中研究问责制的框架和语言。最后,我们提供结论、开放问题和未来方向。Joan Feigenbaum, Aaron D. Jaggard和Rebecca N. Wright(2020),“计算中的问责制:概念和机制”,隐私和安全的基础和趋势®:第2卷,第4期,第247-399页。DOI: 10.1561 / 3300000002。全文可在:http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/3300000002