Grounded Theory as Systems Science: Working with Indigenous Nations for Social Justice

Roxanne Bainbridge, Janya McCalman, M. Redman-Maclaren, M. Whiteside
{"title":"Grounded Theory as Systems Science: Working with Indigenous Nations for Social\n Justice","authors":"Roxanne Bainbridge, Janya McCalman, M. Redman-Maclaren, M. Whiteside","doi":"10.4135/9781526485656.n32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-seventeen marks the 50th anniversary of Glaser and Strauss's seminal text on The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967). Grounded theory has stood the test of time as an inductive, interactive, emergent method with purposeful explanatory intent in the field of qualitative research (Charmaz, 2008b). Its various iterations, such as Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory and Clarke's postmodern situational analysis, attest to its epistemological flexibility (Clarke, 2005; Charmaz, 2006). Our phronetic grounded theory approach and transformational grounded theory contributed a decolonizing variation of grounded theory methods and demonstrated its use in the Indigenous Australian and Pacific contexts (Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013; Redman-MacLaren & Mills, 2015). In a phronetic grounded theory approach, reflective practice informs morally-oriented action that leads to change (Flyvberg, 2001; Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013). With the exception of Charmaz (2017a), for instance, few theorists have explicitly taken up the proposition and utility of grounded theory as decolonizing tool in research. Yet, grounded theory's pragmatist roots and its commitment to social justice suggest that it can be used purposefully in its intent as a decolonizing method (Charmaz, 2017a). Indeed, grounded theory methods respond to many of the discrete critiques of Western research that Indigenous researchers have proffered in recent decades. We contemplate how the utility of grounded theory methods can provide a fresh perspective and maximize the value of research for Indigenous nations.","PeriodicalId":176207,"journal":{"name":"The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656.n32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Twenty-seventeen marks the 50th anniversary of Glaser and Strauss's seminal text on The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967). Grounded theory has stood the test of time as an inductive, interactive, emergent method with purposeful explanatory intent in the field of qualitative research (Charmaz, 2008b). Its various iterations, such as Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory and Clarke's postmodern situational analysis, attest to its epistemological flexibility (Clarke, 2005; Charmaz, 2006). Our phronetic grounded theory approach and transformational grounded theory contributed a decolonizing variation of grounded theory methods and demonstrated its use in the Indigenous Australian and Pacific contexts (Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013; Redman-MacLaren & Mills, 2015). In a phronetic grounded theory approach, reflective practice informs morally-oriented action that leads to change (Flyvberg, 2001; Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013). With the exception of Charmaz (2017a), for instance, few theorists have explicitly taken up the proposition and utility of grounded theory as decolonizing tool in research. Yet, grounded theory's pragmatist roots and its commitment to social justice suggest that it can be used purposefully in its intent as a decolonizing method (Charmaz, 2017a). Indeed, grounded theory methods respond to many of the discrete critiques of Western research that Indigenous researchers have proffered in recent decades. We contemplate how the utility of grounded theory methods can provide a fresh perspective and maximize the value of research for Indigenous nations.
扎根理论作为系统科学:与土著民族为社会正义工作
2017年是格拉泽和施特劳斯的开创性著作《扎根理论的发现》(1967)发表50周年。扎根理论作为定性研究领域中一种具有目的性解释意图的归纳、互动、涌现方法经受住了时间的考验(Charmaz, 2008b)。它的各种迭代,如Charmaz的建构主义扎根理论和Clarke的后现代情境分析,证明了其认识论的灵活性(Clarke, 2005;Charmaz, 2006)。我们的语素扎根理论方法和转化扎根理论为扎根理论方法的非殖民化变体做出了贡献,并证明了其在澳大利亚土著和太平洋环境中的应用(Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013;Redman-MacLaren & Mills, 2015)。在基于语素的理论方法中,反思性实践为道德导向的行动提供信息,从而导致改变(Flyvberg, 2001;Bainbridge, Whiteside, & McCalman, 2013)。例如,除了Charmaz (2017a),很少有理论家明确地将扎根理论的命题和效用作为研究中的非殖民化工具。然而,扎根理论的实用主义根源及其对社会正义的承诺表明,它可以作为一种非殖民化方法有目的地使用(Charmaz, 2017a)。事实上,扎根理论方法回应了近几十年来本土研究者对西方研究提出的许多不同的批评。我们思考如何运用扎根理论方法为土著民族提供新的视角和最大化研究价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信