{"title":"On The Digital Singularity Recognising Virtual Property Through The Eyes of New Jurisprudence Over The Conflicts of Digital Goods","authors":"Bernardo Nejaim, I. Novikov","doi":"10.54934/ijlcw.v1i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper focuses on the analysis of bibliography, jurisprudence and case studies internationally such as Bragg v Linden Labs, forming an analysis of the obstacles for the recognition of virtual property as well as providing arguments for it’s acknowledgment on a multitude of legal systems internationally, all the while incentivizing the debate for its implementation with the use of a set of doctrines and directives. For this purpose, we will make comparisons of the different concepts of property on an international scale through the analysis of a host of different doctrines and jurisprudence from the United States, Europe, Russia and Brazil, aiming to demonstrate the resilience or acceptance of this concept of property. Finally, we will present at the end of this article the aforementioned directives that will serve to guide future discussions and implementations of virtual property.","PeriodicalId":212137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v1i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The present paper focuses on the analysis of bibliography, jurisprudence and case studies internationally such as Bragg v Linden Labs, forming an analysis of the obstacles for the recognition of virtual property as well as providing arguments for it’s acknowledgment on a multitude of legal systems internationally, all the while incentivizing the debate for its implementation with the use of a set of doctrines and directives. For this purpose, we will make comparisons of the different concepts of property on an international scale through the analysis of a host of different doctrines and jurisprudence from the United States, Europe, Russia and Brazil, aiming to demonstrate the resilience or acceptance of this concept of property. Finally, we will present at the end of this article the aforementioned directives that will serve to guide future discussions and implementations of virtual property.
本文着重于对参考书目、法理学和国际案例研究(如Bragg v Linden Labs)的分析,形成了对承认虚拟财产的障碍的分析,并为其在国际上众多法律体系的承认提供了论据,同时通过使用一套理论和指令来激励对其实施的辩论。为此,我们将通过分析来自美国、欧洲、俄罗斯和巴西的许多不同的理论和法理学,在国际范围内对不同的财产概念进行比较,旨在展示财产概念的弹性或可接受性。最后,我们将在本文的末尾介绍上述指令,这些指令将用于指导虚拟财产的未来讨论和实现。