Lamarckian Historical Romance

Human Forms Pub Date : 2019-09-03 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvdf0jb9.7
I. Duncan
{"title":"Lamarckian Historical Romance","authors":"I. Duncan","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvdf0jb9.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses how the politics of the revolutionary era charged the intellectual debates and institutional rivalries that were agitating the emergent science of the forms of life, centered now in Paris. Arguing for the reform of knowledge as a necessary condition of political reform, scientific authors opposed to the Bourbon regime rallied around Lamarckism, and transformist natural history more broadly, throughout the 1820s. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck's protégé Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, emerging as a leading light of the liberal movement, made monstrosity a key research program of the new philosophical anatomy. Geoffroy sought to reaffirm the orderliness of nature by insisting that monstrosities were natural phenomena, subject to natural law-deviations, on classifiable principles, from the archetypal regularity of the species, itself subject to the grand law of “unity of organic composition.” At the same time, monstrosity provided a mechanism for the transformation of species. The chapter then looks at examples of historical fiction and romances that feature powers beyond human nature, such as Victor Hugo's Notre-Dame de Paris.","PeriodicalId":197549,"journal":{"name":"Human Forms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Forms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf0jb9.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter addresses how the politics of the revolutionary era charged the intellectual debates and institutional rivalries that were agitating the emergent science of the forms of life, centered now in Paris. Arguing for the reform of knowledge as a necessary condition of political reform, scientific authors opposed to the Bourbon regime rallied around Lamarckism, and transformist natural history more broadly, throughout the 1820s. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck's protégé Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, emerging as a leading light of the liberal movement, made monstrosity a key research program of the new philosophical anatomy. Geoffroy sought to reaffirm the orderliness of nature by insisting that monstrosities were natural phenomena, subject to natural law-deviations, on classifiable principles, from the archetypal regularity of the species, itself subject to the grand law of “unity of organic composition.” At the same time, monstrosity provided a mechanism for the transformation of species. The chapter then looks at examples of historical fiction and romances that feature powers beyond human nature, such as Victor Hugo's Notre-Dame de Paris.
拉马克的历史浪漫主义
这一章讲述了革命时代的政治如何冲击了知识分子的辩论和制度上的竞争,这些辩论和竞争正在搅动着生命形式的新兴科学,现在以巴黎为中心。在整个19世纪20年代,反对波旁政权的科学作家们主张知识改革是政治改革的必要条件,他们团结在拉马克主义和更广泛的自然历史变革主义周围。让-巴蒂斯特·拉马克的《普罗米罗·圣伊莱尔》是自由主义运动的领军人物,他把怪物作为新哲学解剖学的一个重要研究项目。杰弗里试图通过坚持怪物是自然现象,服从于自然法则——偏离,按照可分类的原则,从物种的原型规则,本身服从于“有机组成的统一性”的伟大法则,来重申自然的有序性。与此同时,怪物为物种的转变提供了一种机制。然后,本章着眼于历史小说和浪漫小说的例子,这些小说以超越人性的力量为特色,比如维克多·雨果的《巴黎圣母院》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信