Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations

Inf. Polity Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI:10.3233/ip-190154
Olivier Rikken, Marijn Janssen, Z. Kwee
{"title":"Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations","authors":"Olivier Rikken, Marijn Janssen, Z. Kwee","doi":"10.3233/ip-190154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of blockchain has resulted in discussions on (new) governance models with multiple actors collaborating. Incidents and problems occurred due to flaws in blockchain protocols, smart contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Often it is unclear how decisions are made concerning evolvement of blockchain applications. In this paper, we identify and analyze potential challenges regarding governance of blockchain initiatives in various types of decentralized networks using literature and case study research. The governance challenges are classified based on a framework consisting of different layers (infrastructure, application, company and institution/country) and stages (design, operate, evolve/crisis). The results show that in various stages and layers, different challenges occur. Furthermore, blockchain applications governance and blockchain infrastructure governance were found to be entangled adding to the challenge. Our research shows a specific need for further research into governance models for DAO applications on permissionless blockchains, linked to the products and services offered whereas in permissioned blockchains and other type of applications, existing governance models might often be feasible. For developing new governance models, we recommend learning from the lessons from the open source community.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-190154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rise of blockchain has resulted in discussions on (new) governance models with multiple actors collaborating. Incidents and problems occurred due to flaws in blockchain protocols, smart contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Often it is unclear how decisions are made concerning evolvement of blockchain applications. In this paper, we identify and analyze potential challenges regarding governance of blockchain initiatives in various types of decentralized networks using literature and case study research. The governance challenges are classified based on a framework consisting of different layers (infrastructure, application, company and institution/country) and stages (design, operate, evolve/crisis). The results show that in various stages and layers, different challenges occur. Furthermore, blockchain applications governance and blockchain infrastructure governance were found to be entangled adding to the challenge. Our research shows a specific need for further research into governance models for DAO applications on permissionless blockchains, linked to the products and services offered whereas in permissioned blockchains and other type of applications, existing governance models might often be feasible. For developing new governance models, we recommend learning from the lessons from the open source community.
区块链和去中心化自治组织的治理挑战
区块链的兴起引发了关于多个参与者合作的(新)治理模型的讨论。区块链协议、智能合约和去中心化自治组织(dao)的缺陷导致了事件和问题的发生。关于区块链应用程序的发展,如何做出决策通常并不清楚。在本文中,我们使用文献和案例研究来识别和分析有关各种类型的分散网络中区块链计划治理的潜在挑战。治理挑战根据由不同层(基础设施、应用程序、公司和机构/国家)和阶段(设计、操作、发展/危机)组成的框架进行分类。结果表明,在不同的阶段和层位,会出现不同的挑战。此外,区块链应用程序治理和区块链基础设施治理被发现相互纠缠,这增加了挑战。我们的研究表明,需要进一步研究无许可区块链上的DAO应用程序的治理模型,这些模型与所提供的产品和服务相关联,而在有许可的区块链和其他类型的应用程序中,现有的治理模型通常是可行的。对于开发新的治理模型,我们建议从开放源代码社区学习经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信