Magnetic force from experiment, equation- and geometry-based calculation using the example of a switching magnet

H. Schmidt, S. Hacia
{"title":"Magnetic force from experiment, equation- and geometry-based calculation using the example of a switching magnet","authors":"H. Schmidt, S. Hacia","doi":"10.1145/3365984.3365992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both equation-based and geometry-based simulation can be used to design magnetic circuits. Equation-based simulation allows direct coupling of the magnetic domain to a large number of other domains and is therefore ideal for system simulation. Geometry-based simulation allows straight-forward implementation of arbitrary spatial arrangements. Both findings make no statement about the actual quality of the results, only about the convenience of use. Both approaches can provide directly comparable results for suitable magnetic circuit geometries. In this study, equation-based calculations are performed using the OpenModelica Connection Editior (OMEdit [5]). Geometry-based calculations are performed using Finite Element Method Magnetics (FEMM [2]). Using these freely available tools, we would like to focus on the question of prediction accuracy for a given geometry well suited for both calculation methods, in this case a flat armature switching magnet. Models are created in both aforementioned simulation tools and a prototype is physically built and tested in the laboratory. This way, we are able to not only compare the results of these two simulation approaches, but also check with the reality tested in the laboratory.","PeriodicalId":394627,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Equation-based Object-oriented Modeling Languages and Tools","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Equation-based Object-oriented Modeling Languages and Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3365984.3365992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Both equation-based and geometry-based simulation can be used to design magnetic circuits. Equation-based simulation allows direct coupling of the magnetic domain to a large number of other domains and is therefore ideal for system simulation. Geometry-based simulation allows straight-forward implementation of arbitrary spatial arrangements. Both findings make no statement about the actual quality of the results, only about the convenience of use. Both approaches can provide directly comparable results for suitable magnetic circuit geometries. In this study, equation-based calculations are performed using the OpenModelica Connection Editior (OMEdit [5]). Geometry-based calculations are performed using Finite Element Method Magnetics (FEMM [2]). Using these freely available tools, we would like to focus on the question of prediction accuracy for a given geometry well suited for both calculation methods, in this case a flat armature switching magnet. Models are created in both aforementioned simulation tools and a prototype is physically built and tested in the laboratory. This way, we are able to not only compare the results of these two simulation approaches, but also check with the reality tested in the laboratory.
磁力从实验、方程和几何的基础上计算,以开关磁铁为例
基于方程的仿真和基于几何的仿真都可以用于磁路设计。基于方程的仿真允许磁域与大量其他域的直接耦合,因此是系统仿真的理想选择。基于几何的模拟允许直接实现任意的空间安排。这两项发现都没有说明结果的实际质量,只说明了使用的便利性。两种方法都可以为合适的磁路几何形状提供直接比较的结果。在本研究中,使用OpenModelica Connection editor (OMEdit[5])进行基于方程的计算。基于几何的计算使用有限元法磁学(FEMM[2])进行。使用这些免费提供的工具,我们想把重点放在给定几何形状的预测精度问题上,这两种计算方法都很适合,在这种情况下是一个扁平电枢开关磁铁。在上述两种仿真工具中创建模型,并在实验室中物理构建和测试原型。这样,我们不仅可以比较这两种模拟方法的结果,还可以与实验室测试的实际结果进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信