“A Sickness which has Grown to Epidemic Proportions”: American Indian Anti-and Decolonial thought During the Long 1960s

D. Cobb, S. Barger, Lily Skopp
{"title":"“A Sickness which has Grown to Epidemic Proportions”: American Indian Anti-and Decolonial thought During the Long 1960s","authors":"D. Cobb, S. Barger, Lily Skopp","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2020.1735921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the wake of World War Two and with the onset of decolonisation and the Cold War, the United States embarked on a mission to ‘modernize’ the economies and cultures of the so-called ‘developing nations’ of the ‘Third World.’ Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Native rights advocates seized upon the language of modernisation, development, nation building, nationalism, anticolonialism, and decolonisation among them. They leveraged these concepts to advance a model for federal-Indian relations predicated on tribal sovereignty and self-determination. In so doing, they became active participants in a global process of confronting and reassessing United States domestic and foreign policy and, in time, the very history of European colonialism and settler colonialism upon which they rested. Exploring the ideas of Native intellectuals, including D’Arcy McNickle (Flathead), Robert K. Thomas (Cherokee), Dorothy Davids (Stockbridge-Munsee), Clyde Warrior (Ponca), and Hank Adams (Assinibione), demands a re-evaluation of the Red Power era, challenges the tacit assumption that anti- and delonial thought emerged sui generis during the 1970 s, and proposes a more expansive and inclusive vision of American Indian intellectual history.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2020.1735921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the wake of World War Two and with the onset of decolonisation and the Cold War, the United States embarked on a mission to ‘modernize’ the economies and cultures of the so-called ‘developing nations’ of the ‘Third World.’ Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Native rights advocates seized upon the language of modernisation, development, nation building, nationalism, anticolonialism, and decolonisation among them. They leveraged these concepts to advance a model for federal-Indian relations predicated on tribal sovereignty and self-determination. In so doing, they became active participants in a global process of confronting and reassessing United States domestic and foreign policy and, in time, the very history of European colonialism and settler colonialism upon which they rested. Exploring the ideas of Native intellectuals, including D’Arcy McNickle (Flathead), Robert K. Thomas (Cherokee), Dorothy Davids (Stockbridge-Munsee), Clyde Warrior (Ponca), and Hank Adams (Assinibione), demands a re-evaluation of the Red Power era, challenges the tacit assumption that anti- and delonial thought emerged sui generis during the 1970 s, and proposes a more expansive and inclusive vision of American Indian intellectual history.
“一种已经发展到流行病程度的疾病”:美国印第安人在漫长的20世纪60年代的反殖民和非殖民思想
在第二次世界大战之后,随着非殖民化和冷战的开始,美国开始了一项使命,即“第三世界”的所谓“发展中国家”的经济和文化“现代化”。在整个20世纪50年代和60年代,土著权利倡导者抓住了现代化、发展、国家建设、民族主义、反殖民主义和非殖民化等语言。他们利用这些概念来推进以部落主权和自决为基础的联邦与印第安人关系模式。在这样做的过程中,他们积极参与对抗和重新评估美国内政和外交政策的全球进程,并及时评估他们所依赖的欧洲殖民主义和移民殖民主义的历史。探索土著知识分子的思想,包括达西·麦克尼克(Flathead)、罗伯特·k·托马斯(Cherokee)、多洛西·戴维斯(Stockbridge-Munsee)、克莱德·勇士(Clyde Warrior) (Ponca)和汉克·亚当斯(Hank Adams) (Assinibione),需要对红色权力时代进行重新评估,挑战反殖民思想在20世纪70年代自成一体的默认假设,并提出一个更广阔和包容的美国印第安人思想史的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信