Cross-cultural homogeneity in social perspective taking: China and the United States.

Sarthak Giri
{"title":"Cross-cultural homogeneity in social perspective taking: China and the United States.","authors":"Sarthak Giri","doi":"10.1037/BDB0000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has suggested that, given the proper methods of measurement, there is little or no difference in Kohlbergian stages of moral development and social perspective taking between different cultures. Participants in the United States and China were administered the Perspective Taking Instrument developed by Core Complexity Assessments in coordination with the Dare Association, Inc., to measure stage development of social perspective taking. Using Rasch analysis, we computed stage scores on the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC) to compare participants. This study represents the first cross-cultural application of MHC analysis. We found that the progress of individuals’ moral development in American and Chinese cultures were both nearly identical to the developmental course predicted by the MHC, despite obvious surface-level differences in the social organization and behavior of the 2 cultures.","PeriodicalId":314223,"journal":{"name":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/BDB0000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Research has suggested that, given the proper methods of measurement, there is little or no difference in Kohlbergian stages of moral development and social perspective taking between different cultures. Participants in the United States and China were administered the Perspective Taking Instrument developed by Core Complexity Assessments in coordination with the Dare Association, Inc., to measure stage development of social perspective taking. Using Rasch analysis, we computed stage scores on the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC) to compare participants. This study represents the first cross-cultural application of MHC analysis. We found that the progress of individuals’ moral development in American and Chinese cultures were both nearly identical to the developmental course predicted by the MHC, despite obvious surface-level differences in the social organization and behavior of the 2 cultures.
社会视角下的跨文化同质性:中国与美国。
研究表明,在适当的测量方法下,不同文化之间的道德发展和社会视角的科尔伯格阶段几乎没有差异。美国和中国的参与者使用了由核心复杂性评估公司与Dare协会合作开发的观点采纳工具来衡量社会观点采纳的阶段发展。使用Rasch分析,我们在层次复杂性(MHC)模型上计算阶段分数来比较参与者。本研究是MHC分析的首次跨文化应用。我们发现,尽管中美两种文化在社会组织和行为上存在明显的表面差异,但两种文化的个体道德发展进程与MHC预测的发展进程几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信