2. IR as an Academic Subject

Roberta Jackson, Georg Sørensen, J. Møller
{"title":"2. IR as an Academic Subject","authors":"Roberta Jackson, Georg Sørensen, J. Møller","doi":"10.1093/hepl/9780198707554.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how thinking about international relations (IR) has evolved since IR became an academic subject around the time of the First World War. The focus is on four established IR traditions: realism, liberalism, International Society, and International Political Economy (IPE). The chapter first considers three major debates that have arisen since IR became an academic subject at the end of the First World War: the first was between utopian liberalism and realism; the second between traditional approaches and behaviouralism; the third between neorealism/neoliberalism and neo-Marxism. There is an emerging fourth debate, that between established traditions and post-positivist alternatives. The chapter concludes with an analysis of alternative approaches that challenge the established traditions of IR, and with a discussion about criteria for good theory in IR.","PeriodicalId":118431,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to International Relations","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198707554.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how thinking about international relations (IR) has evolved since IR became an academic subject around the time of the First World War. The focus is on four established IR traditions: realism, liberalism, International Society, and International Political Economy (IPE). The chapter first considers three major debates that have arisen since IR became an academic subject at the end of the First World War: the first was between utopian liberalism and realism; the second between traditional approaches and behaviouralism; the third between neorealism/neoliberalism and neo-Marxism. There is an emerging fourth debate, that between established traditions and post-positivist alternatives. The chapter concludes with an analysis of alternative approaches that challenge the established traditions of IR, and with a discussion about criteria for good theory in IR.
2. 国际关系作为一门学术学科
本章考察了自第一次世界大战前后国际关系成为一门学术学科以来,人们对国际关系的思考是如何演变的。重点是四个已建立的国际关系传统:现实主义、自由主义、国际社会和国际政治经济学(IPE)。本章首先考虑了自第一次世界大战结束后国际关系成为一门学术学科以来出现的三个主要辩论:第一个是乌托邦自由主义与现实主义之间的辩论;第二种是传统方法与行为主义之间的差异;新现实主义/新自由主义和新马克思主义之间的第三个。第四种争论正在兴起,即在既定传统和后实证主义选择之间的争论。本章最后分析了挑战IR既定传统的替代方法,并讨论了IR中良好理论的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信