Use of Carbon Composite Repair Technologies to Reinforce Crack-Like Flaws in High Pressure Pipelines

David B. Futch, S. Limon, C. Alexander
{"title":"Use of Carbon Composite Repair Technologies to Reinforce Crack-Like Flaws in High Pressure Pipelines","authors":"David B. Futch, S. Limon, C. Alexander","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pipe body cracking and seam weld crack-like flaws can be encountered on virtually all pipeline systems and are traditionally repaired via a cutout, grinding, or full-encirclement metallic sleeves. Although the effectiveness of steel repair sleeves is well established, they have drawbacks when repairing out of roundness pipe and they can require large pipe excavations to find a suitable location for in-service welding. Moreover, finding a clean in-service welding landing zone can be difficult for vintage line pipe steel which have a higher probability of laminations and the potential of having seam weld defects in low frequency ERW/EFW pipe. Furthermore, safety is also a concern when welding onto an operational pipeline. An alternative to repairing planar flaws is the use of non-weldable, light weight, wet-lay carbon fiber composite system. A composite repair system has distinct advantages as it can contour to most pipe shapes, resulting in shorter repair lengths (and therefore shorter excavations), and no welding is required. Composite repair systems have historically been used to reinforce areas of external corrosion and dents; however, their use has not been fully extended to reinforce crack-like flaws. A study was conducted where three carbon-epoxy composite technologies were explored as an effective repair option for pipelines with crack-like defects.\n A total of 35 reinforced external axial cracks were tested in base material and the longitudinal weld in 1960’s ERW pipe samples. Each crack was initiated by fatigue from a machined notch. Pressure cycle testing from 10%–72% SMYS showed that the carbon composite repair systems tested can effectively repair axial external crack-like defects in the pipe base and seam weld. The repaired cracks in the ERW bond line ranged from 45% to 55% wall thickness deep and all survived 25,000 test cycles with less than 10% wall thickness of additional growth. The aggressive test pressure cycles correlate conservatively to 600 to 1,000 years of fatigue life for normal gas pipeline operations, which demonstrated a fatigue life extension of 3 to 5 times when compared to unreinforced defects that leaked below 10,000 cycles. The contents of this paper and associated insights are valuable to the pipeline industry in extending the use of carbon composite repair technologies to reinforcing cracks and seam weld crack-like flaws based on full-scale testing and metallurgical assessment of post-tested fatigue growth of cracks.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pipe body cracking and seam weld crack-like flaws can be encountered on virtually all pipeline systems and are traditionally repaired via a cutout, grinding, or full-encirclement metallic sleeves. Although the effectiveness of steel repair sleeves is well established, they have drawbacks when repairing out of roundness pipe and they can require large pipe excavations to find a suitable location for in-service welding. Moreover, finding a clean in-service welding landing zone can be difficult for vintage line pipe steel which have a higher probability of laminations and the potential of having seam weld defects in low frequency ERW/EFW pipe. Furthermore, safety is also a concern when welding onto an operational pipeline. An alternative to repairing planar flaws is the use of non-weldable, light weight, wet-lay carbon fiber composite system. A composite repair system has distinct advantages as it can contour to most pipe shapes, resulting in shorter repair lengths (and therefore shorter excavations), and no welding is required. Composite repair systems have historically been used to reinforce areas of external corrosion and dents; however, their use has not been fully extended to reinforce crack-like flaws. A study was conducted where three carbon-epoxy composite technologies were explored as an effective repair option for pipelines with crack-like defects. A total of 35 reinforced external axial cracks were tested in base material and the longitudinal weld in 1960’s ERW pipe samples. Each crack was initiated by fatigue from a machined notch. Pressure cycle testing from 10%–72% SMYS showed that the carbon composite repair systems tested can effectively repair axial external crack-like defects in the pipe base and seam weld. The repaired cracks in the ERW bond line ranged from 45% to 55% wall thickness deep and all survived 25,000 test cycles with less than 10% wall thickness of additional growth. The aggressive test pressure cycles correlate conservatively to 600 to 1,000 years of fatigue life for normal gas pipeline operations, which demonstrated a fatigue life extension of 3 to 5 times when compared to unreinforced defects that leaked below 10,000 cycles. The contents of this paper and associated insights are valuable to the pipeline industry in extending the use of carbon composite repair technologies to reinforcing cracks and seam weld crack-like flaws based on full-scale testing and metallurgical assessment of post-tested fatigue growth of cracks.
利用碳复合材料修复高压管道裂纹状缺陷
几乎所有管道系统都可能遇到管体开裂和焊缝裂纹样缺陷,传统上通过切割、研磨或全包金属套管进行修复。尽管钢修复套的有效性已经得到了很好的证实,但它们在修复非圆管时存在缺陷,并且它们可能需要大量的管道挖掘才能找到合适的位置进行在职焊接。此外,寻找一个干净的在役焊接着落区对于老式线管钢来说是很困难的,因为在低频ERW/EFW管中,层压的可能性更高,并且有潜在的焊缝缺陷。此外,当焊接到运行管道上时,安全性也是一个问题。修复平面缺陷的另一种方法是使用不可焊接、重量轻、湿铺碳纤维复合材料系统。复合修复系统具有明显的优势,因为它可以适应大多数管道的形状,从而缩短修复长度(从而缩短挖掘时间),并且不需要焊接。复合材料修复系统历来用于加固外部腐蚀和凹痕区域;然而,它们的使用还没有完全扩展到加固裂纹状缺陷。在一项研究中,研究了三种碳-环氧复合材料技术作为裂缝类缺陷管道的有效修复选择。对20世纪60年代的ERW管样品进行了基材和纵向焊缝共35条增强轴向外裂纹的试验研究。每个裂纹都是由加工缺口的疲劳引起的。10% ~ 72% SMYS的压力循环试验表明,所测试的碳复合材料修复体系能有效修复管基和焊缝轴向外裂纹状缺陷。修复后的ERW粘结线上的裂缝深度在45%到55%之间,并且在25000个测试循环中都存活了下来,壁厚的额外增长小于10%。对于正常的天然气管道操作,侵略性测试压力循环保守地与600到1000年的疲劳寿命相关,与未加固的缺陷相比,在10,000循环以下泄漏,其疲劳寿命延长了3到5倍。本文的内容和相关见解对管道行业有价值,可以将碳复合材料修复技术的应用扩展到基于全尺寸测试和测试后裂纹疲劳扩展的冶金评估的裂纹和焊缝裂纹状缺陷的强化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信