Tastes, Values, and the Future of Law and Economics

E. Zamir
{"title":"Tastes, Values, and the Future of Law and Economics","authors":"E. Zamir","doi":"10.1093/JRLS/JLX028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a Review of Guido Calabresi’s fascinating and thought-provoking new book, The Future of Law and Economics (presented in a book symposium held at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in December 2016). The Review proposes to break the notion of commodification, as used by Calabresi, into two distinct notions: monetization and commodification. It then focuses on the distinction between positive and normative economic analysis, and argues that even the supposedly positive parts of the book’s analysis are actually normative (and that in this regard Calabresi’s analysis is no different from the traditional economic analysis that he criticizes). Finally, the Review critically analyzes the proposal to integrate non-consequentialist, non-welfarist, and non-utilitarian moral concerns into economic analysis by treating them as “preferences.” It argues that within both normative and positive analyses, these concerns should be treated as what they are, namely normative judgments. The Review concludes by pointing to a possible, alternative way of integrating such moral concerns into cost-benefit analysis.","PeriodicalId":125434,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JRLS/JLX028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This is a Review of Guido Calabresi’s fascinating and thought-provoking new book, The Future of Law and Economics (presented in a book symposium held at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in December 2016). The Review proposes to break the notion of commodification, as used by Calabresi, into two distinct notions: monetization and commodification. It then focuses on the distinction between positive and normative economic analysis, and argues that even the supposedly positive parts of the book’s analysis are actually normative (and that in this regard Calabresi’s analysis is no different from the traditional economic analysis that he criticizes). Finally, the Review critically analyzes the proposal to integrate non-consequentialist, non-welfarist, and non-utilitarian moral concerns into economic analysis by treating them as “preferences.” It argues that within both normative and positive analyses, these concerns should be treated as what they are, namely normative judgments. The Review concludes by pointing to a possible, alternative way of integrating such moral concerns into cost-benefit analysis.
品味,价值观,以及法律和经济学的未来
本文是对Guido Calabresi引人入胜且发人深省的新书《法律与经济学的未来》(2016年12月在耶路撒冷希伯来大学举行的图书研讨会上发表)的评论。《评论》建议将Calabresi所使用的商品化概念分解为两个不同的概念:货币化和商品化。然后,它将重点放在积极和规范经济分析之间的区别上,并辩称,即使是本书分析中被认为是积极的部分,实际上也是规范的(在这方面,卡拉布雷西的分析与他所批评的传统经济分析没有什么不同)。最后,《评论》批判性地分析了将非结果主义、非福利主义和非功利主义的道德关切作为“偏好”纳入经济分析的建议。它认为,在规范性和实证分析中,这些关注应该被视为它们的本来面目,即规范性判断。《评论》最后指出了一种将这种道德问题纳入成本效益分析的可能的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信