Efficacy of Dwitiya BaladiBastiand Shaman Chikitsaas an Analgesic in the Management of Katigraha (Low Back Pain).

V. Aggarwal, Arun Gupta
{"title":"Efficacy of Dwitiya BaladiBastiand Shaman Chikitsaas an Analgesic in the Management of Katigraha (Low Back Pain).","authors":"V. Aggarwal, Arun Gupta","doi":"10.47223/irjay.2023.6503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Back Pain is the remarkably common disability around the world. Despite its frequency, backache is not a dramatic disease that arouses scientific curiosity and interest to the practitioners. Here an attempt has been made to evaluate the analgesic effect of Basti Chikitsa (Ayurvedic Enema therapy) in the patients with Katigraha (Chronic low back pain) Aim: We aimed to evaluate the Rujahara (Analgesic) Effect of Dwitiya Baladi Yapana Basti in Comparison to Ayurvedic Medication (Tryodashanga Gugglu and Rasnadi Kwath) in the Management of Katigraha (Low Back Pain). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 60 clinically diagnosed cases of Katigraha (Low Back Pain) from OPD of Ch. Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan, Khera Dabar, Najafgarh, New Delhi in a period of 12 months after taking institutional ethical clearance. Parameters to evaluate the analgesic effect were Oswestry’s disability index (ODI) as subjective parameter and Visual Analouge scale, Kemp’s test as objective parameters. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A – Dwitiya Baladi Yapana Basti was given and in Group B- Tryodashanga Gugglu and Rasnadi Kwath were given. Results: A significant difference was found between two groups in objective parameters. In Group A there was a relief of 29.8% in ODI Scale, VAS Scale33.1% and Kemp’s test -65.2 % whereas in Group B there was a relief of 33.1% ODI scale, VAS Scale-22.4% and Kemp’s test- 36.8%. Conclusion: Both the group showed mild to moderate relief in the management of Katigraha. Both the group are equally effective in reducing the Ruja (pain) in Katigraha but Basti Karma showed more relief in objective parameters. No major adverse or side effect were encountered during the course of study","PeriodicalId":431628,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal of Ayurveda & Yoga","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal of Ayurveda & Yoga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47223/irjay.2023.6503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Back Pain is the remarkably common disability around the world. Despite its frequency, backache is not a dramatic disease that arouses scientific curiosity and interest to the practitioners. Here an attempt has been made to evaluate the analgesic effect of Basti Chikitsa (Ayurvedic Enema therapy) in the patients with Katigraha (Chronic low back pain) Aim: We aimed to evaluate the Rujahara (Analgesic) Effect of Dwitiya Baladi Yapana Basti in Comparison to Ayurvedic Medication (Tryodashanga Gugglu and Rasnadi Kwath) in the Management of Katigraha (Low Back Pain). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 60 clinically diagnosed cases of Katigraha (Low Back Pain) from OPD of Ch. Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan, Khera Dabar, Najafgarh, New Delhi in a period of 12 months after taking institutional ethical clearance. Parameters to evaluate the analgesic effect were Oswestry’s disability index (ODI) as subjective parameter and Visual Analouge scale, Kemp’s test as objective parameters. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A – Dwitiya Baladi Yapana Basti was given and in Group B- Tryodashanga Gugglu and Rasnadi Kwath were given. Results: A significant difference was found between two groups in objective parameters. In Group A there was a relief of 29.8% in ODI Scale, VAS Scale33.1% and Kemp’s test -65.2 % whereas in Group B there was a relief of 33.1% ODI scale, VAS Scale-22.4% and Kemp’s test- 36.8%. Conclusion: Both the group showed mild to moderate relief in the management of Katigraha. Both the group are equally effective in reducing the Ruja (pain) in Katigraha but Basti Karma showed more relief in objective parameters. No major adverse or side effect were encountered during the course of study
德维提亚baladibastian和萨满奇奇特萨镇痛药治疗腰痛的疗效观察。
背景:背部疼痛是世界范围内非常常见的残疾。尽管它的频率,背部疼痛不是一个戏剧性的疾病,引起科学的好奇心和兴趣的从业者。本研究旨在评价阿育吠陀灌肠疗法(Basti Chikitsa)对慢性腰痛患者的镇痛效果。目的:比较阿育吠陀药物(Tryodashanga Gugglu和Rasnadi Kwath)对慢性腰痛患者的镇痛效果。材料和方法:本研究在接受机构伦理审查后的12个月内,对60例临床诊断为Katigraha(腰痛)的患者进行了研究。这些患者来自位于新德里纳贾夫加尔Khera Dabar的Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan的OPD。以Oswestry失能指数(ODI)为主观参数,以视觉模拟量表(Visual Analouge scale)为客观参数,以Kemp试验为客观参数评价镇痛效果。参与者分为两组:A组给予Dwitiya Baladi Yapana Basti, B组给予Tryodashanga Gugglu和Rasnadi Kwath。结果:两组患者客观指标比较差异有统计学意义。A组ODI量表、VAS量表- 33.1%、Kemp量表- 65.2%缓解29.8%,B组ODI量表、VAS量表-22.4%、Kemp量表- 36.8%缓解33.1%。结论:两组患者对Katigraha的治疗均有轻度至中度缓解。两组在减轻Katigraha疼痛方面同样有效,但Basti Karma在客观参数上表现出更多的缓解。在研究过程中没有遇到重大的不良反应或副作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信