Themes in West Africa's History (review)

J. Hargreaves
{"title":"Themes in West Africa's History (review)","authors":"J. Hargreaves","doi":"10.1353/afr.2007.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most controversial, perhaps, is Krikler’s explanation of the pogrom-like violence that white crowds directed at Africans (including women and children) in the three days before 10 March. They did this not because they viewed Africans as ‘scabs’; indeed, they did not consider Africans, despite their centrality in the production process, to be part of the working class at all. They did it because – psychologically traumatized by their rulers’ and employers’ treatment of them, and by the enormity of their imminent declaration of war on the rest of the white community – they frenziedly deceived themselves that it was not they but rather Africans, into whose despised underclass status they feared being cast, who were imperilling the social order. The massacres of Africans were a cry for help, a collective transference despairingly signalling white racial solidarity at the very moment it was about to be rent. In developing this interpretation, Krikler draws illuminating comparisons with the urban ‘race riots’ that occurred contemporaneously in the United States. Krikler strikes a good balance in explicating the contradictory mix of white-supremacist and class-conscious motives that animated the rebels of 1922. Some readers may find this a distinctly old-fashioned study given its preoccupation with whites and with labour struggles, and may feel that the title’s reference to ‘racial killing’ is a marketing ploy rather than a reflection of the book’s main emphasis. That would be unfair. This is a scrupulously researched and annotated analysis representing a new level of maturation in South African historical scholarship.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afr.2007.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most controversial, perhaps, is Krikler’s explanation of the pogrom-like violence that white crowds directed at Africans (including women and children) in the three days before 10 March. They did this not because they viewed Africans as ‘scabs’; indeed, they did not consider Africans, despite their centrality in the production process, to be part of the working class at all. They did it because – psychologically traumatized by their rulers’ and employers’ treatment of them, and by the enormity of their imminent declaration of war on the rest of the white community – they frenziedly deceived themselves that it was not they but rather Africans, into whose despised underclass status they feared being cast, who were imperilling the social order. The massacres of Africans were a cry for help, a collective transference despairingly signalling white racial solidarity at the very moment it was about to be rent. In developing this interpretation, Krikler draws illuminating comparisons with the urban ‘race riots’ that occurred contemporaneously in the United States. Krikler strikes a good balance in explicating the contradictory mix of white-supremacist and class-conscious motives that animated the rebels of 1922. Some readers may find this a distinctly old-fashioned study given its preoccupation with whites and with labour struggles, and may feel that the title’s reference to ‘racial killing’ is a marketing ploy rather than a reflection of the book’s main emphasis. That would be unfair. This is a scrupulously researched and annotated analysis representing a new level of maturation in South African historical scholarship.
西非历史主题(回顾)
最有争议的也许是Krikler对3月10日前三天白人人群针对非洲人(包括妇女和儿童)的大屠杀般的暴力行为的解释。他们这样做不是因为他们认为非洲人是“痂”;事实上,尽管非洲人在生产过程中处于中心地位,但他们根本不认为非洲人是工人阶级的一部分。他们之所以这样做,是因为他们的统治者和雇主对待他们的方式给他们造成了心理创伤,而且他们即将对其他白人社区宣战的规模之大,让他们疯狂地欺骗自己,认为危害社会秩序的不是他们,而是非洲人,他们害怕被置于受人鄙视的下层阶级地位。对非洲人的屠杀是一种求救的呐喊,一种绝望的集体转移,在白人种族团结即将破裂的时刻发出信号。在发展这种解释的过程中,Krikler与同期发生在美国的城市“种族骚乱”进行了有启发性的比较。Krikler很好地平衡了白人至上主义和阶级意识动机的矛盾混合,这些动机激发了1922年的叛乱。有些读者可能会觉得这是一项明显过时的研究,因为它专注于白人和劳工斗争,并且可能会觉得标题中提到的“种族屠杀”是一种营销策略,而不是书中主要重点的反映。这是不公平的。这是一个严谨的研究和注释的分析,代表了南非历史学术成熟的新水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信