Wireless Sensor Network Performance Evaluation on Building with ZigBee Transmission

Octarina Nur Samijayani, A. Muthiah
{"title":"Wireless Sensor Network Performance Evaluation on Building with ZigBee Transmission","authors":"Octarina Nur Samijayani, A. Muthiah","doi":"10.1109/ICSCEE.2018.8538365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing of smart buildings, the pursuit on using the right communication technology is crucial. ZigBee as known for a low data rate, low power, and low cost wireless communication standard for building control applications, well suited for use. This leads to the problem identification which is manufacturers that indicates the ZigBee device’s or XBee performance specification in a Line of Sight (LOS) setting, that it becomes difficult to indicate such performance in real indoor scenarios, with many obstacles in between transmissions. Conducting range and throughput tests are some of the ways to evaluate and analyze the XBee device’s performance. Which the results show that the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) values in the LOS setting are much greater than the Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) setting. With values such as −67.8 dBm in the LOS setting, while values such as −80.54 dBm in the NLOS setting. Then for the packet loss and error results, it shows that the LOS setting has a lower rate of packet loss and error than the NLOS setting. With packet losses and error below 0.21% in the LOS setting, while in the NLOS setting the packet losses and error can be as big as 7.60%. Which also shows that the PTP network tend to have more packet losses and error than the Multi network, as much as 30 packets, even though it does have faster transmission than the Multi network, which can go as fast as 3.164 kbps. As for the LQI network, in the NLOS setting, shows that distances above 10 meters tend to be unstable and weaken. Concluding that for indoor transmissions, such as buildings, with many obstacles, the recommended operating range for the XBee device used in this research is up to 10 meters, and the recommended network is the Multi network (mesh network).","PeriodicalId":265737,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCEE.2018.8538365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the growing of smart buildings, the pursuit on using the right communication technology is crucial. ZigBee as known for a low data rate, low power, and low cost wireless communication standard for building control applications, well suited for use. This leads to the problem identification which is manufacturers that indicates the ZigBee device’s or XBee performance specification in a Line of Sight (LOS) setting, that it becomes difficult to indicate such performance in real indoor scenarios, with many obstacles in between transmissions. Conducting range and throughput tests are some of the ways to evaluate and analyze the XBee device’s performance. Which the results show that the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) values in the LOS setting are much greater than the Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) setting. With values such as −67.8 dBm in the LOS setting, while values such as −80.54 dBm in the NLOS setting. Then for the packet loss and error results, it shows that the LOS setting has a lower rate of packet loss and error than the NLOS setting. With packet losses and error below 0.21% in the LOS setting, while in the NLOS setting the packet losses and error can be as big as 7.60%. Which also shows that the PTP network tend to have more packet losses and error than the Multi network, as much as 30 packets, even though it does have faster transmission than the Multi network, which can go as fast as 3.164 kbps. As for the LQI network, in the NLOS setting, shows that distances above 10 meters tend to be unstable and weaken. Concluding that for indoor transmissions, such as buildings, with many obstacles, the recommended operating range for the XBee device used in this research is up to 10 meters, and the recommended network is the Multi network (mesh network).
基于ZigBee传输的楼宇无线传感器网络性能评估
随着智能建筑的不断发展,对正确使用通信技术的追求至关重要。ZigBee作为一种众所周知的低数据速率、低功耗、低成本的无线通信标准,适用于楼宇控制应用,非常适合使用。这导致问题识别,即制造商在视线(LOS)设置中指示ZigBee设备或XBee性能规范,在真实的室内场景中难以指示此类性能,传输之间存在许多障碍。进行范围和吞吐量测试是评估和分析XBee设备性能的一些方法。结果表明,视距设置下的接收信号强度指标(RSSI)值远大于非视距(NLOS)设置。LOS设置的值为−67.8 dBm, NLOS设置的值为−80.54 dBm。然后是丢包和错误率的结果,可以看出LOS设置的丢包率和错误率比NLOS设置的低。LOS设置的丢包率和丢包误差在0.21%以下,而NLOS设置的丢包率和丢包误差可高达7.60%。这也表明PTP网络比Multi网络有更多的丢包和错误,多达30个数据包,尽管它的传输速度比Multi网络快,可以快到3.164 kbps。对于LQI网,在NLOS环境下,表明10米以上的距离趋于不稳定和减弱。综上所述,对于室内传输,如有许多障碍物的建筑物,本研究中使用的XBee设备的推荐工作范围可达10米,推荐网络为Multi网络(mesh网络)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信