Book review: How to use storytelling in your academic writing: Techniques for engaging readers and successfully navigating the writing and publishing processes
{"title":"Book review: How to use storytelling in your academic writing: Techniques for engaging readers and successfully navigating the writing and publishing processes","authors":"Geof Hill, J. Kelder","doi":"10.59197/asrhe.v2i1.5595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book review illuminates Pollock’s (2021) text ‘How to use storytelling in your academic writing’. In the longstanding discipline of literary criticism/study, a book review is often the work of a single author and written to expose the reader/audience to the contents of the book under investigation (Campbell & Jamieson, 1978). The review we have offered here adopts a writing style of a conversation about the book between two academics, and thus posits a new mode of book-review writing. The intent of the article is to challenge expectations of what counts as a book review. The review itself recommends the book as a valuable contribution to the collection of academic books on academic writing.","PeriodicalId":158792,"journal":{"name":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59197/asrhe.v2i1.5595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This book review illuminates Pollock’s (2021) text ‘How to use storytelling in your academic writing’. In the longstanding discipline of literary criticism/study, a book review is often the work of a single author and written to expose the reader/audience to the contents of the book under investigation (Campbell & Jamieson, 1978). The review we have offered here adopts a writing style of a conversation about the book between two academics, and thus posits a new mode of book-review writing. The intent of the article is to challenge expectations of what counts as a book review. The review itself recommends the book as a valuable contribution to the collection of academic books on academic writing.