Big But Brittle: Economic Perspectives on the Future of the Law Firm in the New Economy

Bernard A. Burk, D. McGowan
{"title":"Big But Brittle: Economic Perspectives on the Future of the Law Firm in the New Economy","authors":"Bernard A. Burk, D. McGowan","doi":"10.7916/CBLR.V2011I1.2901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article addresses three deceptively simple questions. First, why have law firms grown for over forty years, up to the onset of the recent recession, as quickly as they have? Second, why did law firms grow in the unusual configuration widely observed during that time? Third, should lawyers, clients, law students, and law schools expect these familiar trends in growth and configuration to reassert themselves as the economy improves, as they have after every recession since the1970s? The various academic approaches to these questions to date are grounded in such notions as diversification, asset specificity, “tournament” theory, and reputational and agency-cost concerns at the level of the firm as a whole. We argue that these approaches do not explain or predict actualevents very well, and thus offer little guidance for the future. We suggest two perspectives that appear more consistent with the available empirical evidence, and thus may better predict future trends. The first perspective shows that when lawyers with appropriately complementary reputations and connections (“relational capital”) join together in a firm, they can each better exploit the value of their own relational capital and thus jointly create value greater than the sum of their individual contributions. The positive feedback created by an internal referral network among firm members generates growth for the firm and provides a bond among its members, albeit a relatively weak one. This perspective is new to the literature on law firm economics, and helps explain why large firms have long continued to grow despite apparent diseconomies of scale. It also suggests why firms may grow to large sizes yet be brittle enough to shed partners regularly in the process—and in some cases suddenly splinter altogether. The second perspective analyzes large law firms using familiar economic principles concerning technological innovation and transaction costs, principles that have been largely overlooked in the literature on large firms. We argue that reductions in particular transaction costs and in the cost of certain key inputs are helpful in explaining a number of the trends in the staffing and pricing of legal services documented in recent years. We apply these perspectives to derive a range of predictions for law firms and law schools in the years to come. We conclude that, despite rumors of the “Death of Big Law,” the large firm is here to stay. But we also conclude that the evolving configuration of large law firms has profound implications for practicing and aspiring lawyers, as well as for the law schools that prepare students for the increasingly global and competitive market for their services.","PeriodicalId":407537,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Empirical Studies of Employment & Labor Law (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Empirical Studies of Employment & Labor Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CBLR.V2011I1.2901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This Article addresses three deceptively simple questions. First, why have law firms grown for over forty years, up to the onset of the recent recession, as quickly as they have? Second, why did law firms grow in the unusual configuration widely observed during that time? Third, should lawyers, clients, law students, and law schools expect these familiar trends in growth and configuration to reassert themselves as the economy improves, as they have after every recession since the1970s? The various academic approaches to these questions to date are grounded in such notions as diversification, asset specificity, “tournament” theory, and reputational and agency-cost concerns at the level of the firm as a whole. We argue that these approaches do not explain or predict actualevents very well, and thus offer little guidance for the future. We suggest two perspectives that appear more consistent with the available empirical evidence, and thus may better predict future trends. The first perspective shows that when lawyers with appropriately complementary reputations and connections (“relational capital”) join together in a firm, they can each better exploit the value of their own relational capital and thus jointly create value greater than the sum of their individual contributions. The positive feedback created by an internal referral network among firm members generates growth for the firm and provides a bond among its members, albeit a relatively weak one. This perspective is new to the literature on law firm economics, and helps explain why large firms have long continued to grow despite apparent diseconomies of scale. It also suggests why firms may grow to large sizes yet be brittle enough to shed partners regularly in the process—and in some cases suddenly splinter altogether. The second perspective analyzes large law firms using familiar economic principles concerning technological innovation and transaction costs, principles that have been largely overlooked in the literature on large firms. We argue that reductions in particular transaction costs and in the cost of certain key inputs are helpful in explaining a number of the trends in the staffing and pricing of legal services documented in recent years. We apply these perspectives to derive a range of predictions for law firms and law schools in the years to come. We conclude that, despite rumors of the “Death of Big Law,” the large firm is here to stay. But we also conclude that the evolving configuration of large law firms has profound implications for practicing and aspiring lawyers, as well as for the law schools that prepare students for the increasingly global and competitive market for their services.
《大而易碎:新经济下律师事务所未来的经济学展望》
本文解决了三个看似简单的问题。首先,为什么律师事务所在最近的经济衰退开始之前的四十多年里一直在快速发展?第二,为什么律师事务所会以当时广泛观察到的不寻常的结构发展?第三,律师、客户、法律系学生和法学院是否应该期待,随着经济的好转,这些熟悉的增长和配置趋势会再次出现,就像上世纪70年代以来每次经济衰退后发生的那样?迄今为止,针对这些问题的各种学术方法都是基于诸如多样化、资产专用性、“竞赛”理论以及企业整体层面的声誉和代理成本问题等概念。我们认为,这些方法不能很好地解释或预测实际事件,因此对未来提供的指导很少。我们提出了两种更符合现有经验证据的观点,从而可以更好地预测未来趋势。第一种观点认为,当具有适当互补的声誉和关系(“关系资本”)的律师在事务所中联合起来时,他们可以更好地利用自己的关系资本的价值,从而共同创造比他们个人贡献总和更大的价值。企业成员之间的内部推荐网络所产生的积极反馈为企业带来了增长,并在成员之间提供了一种联系,尽管这种联系相对较弱。这一观点对于律师事务所经济学的文献来说是全新的,并且有助于解释为什么尽管存在明显的规模不经济,大型律师事务所仍能长期持续增长。这也解释了为什么公司会发展到很大的规模,但在这个过程中却脆弱到经常抛弃合伙人——在某些情况下还会突然分裂。第二个视角分析大型律师事务所使用熟悉的经济原则有关技术创新和交易成本,原则在很大程度上被忽视的文献大公司。我们认为,特定交易成本和某些关键投入成本的降低有助于解释近年来记录的法律服务人员配备和定价方面的一些趋势。我们运用这些观点对未来几年的律师事务所和法学院进行了一系列预测。我们的结论是,尽管有“大律所将死”的传言,但大律所仍将继续存在。但我们也得出结论,大型律师事务所不断变化的结构对执业律师和有抱负的律师有着深远的影响,对那些为学生提供服务以应对日益全球化和竞争激烈的市场的法学院也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信