A Study on the Duty of Disclosure in the U.S. Insurance Law

Won-gak Kim
{"title":"A Study on the Duty of Disclosure in the U.S. Insurance Law","authors":"Won-gak Kim","doi":"10.36248/kdps.2023.17.2.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The duty of disclosure became a doctrine of insurance contracts in 1766 with the decision in Carter v. Boehm and was codified in the U.K. Marine Insurance Act(MIA) of 1906. Since then, insurance laws in every country have provided provisions for the duty of disclosure. The specifics of the duty of disclosure have evolved over time as the interpretation of good faith in insurance contracts and the need to address moral hazard in underwriting have changed from country to country and era to era. Today, however, the duty of disclosure continues to be debated in every country, and the United States is no exception. \nThe United States dutifully followed English law in the early years of its founding. Over the centuries, it has become part of Anglo-American law. However, it has also developed a significant amount of its law based on the needs and unique circumstances of American society. Insurance law in the United States is no different. Currently, U.S. state laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure differ from the U.K. laws, which were amended in 2012 and 2015. In addition, insurance laws and precedents are often different in each state in the United States. British laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure have been steadily and continuously introduced in Korea. However, it seems that no article in Korea provides a detailed introduction to the laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure in the United States. Although Korean insurance law belongs to the civil law system, the laws on the duty of disclosure rely very little on the difference in the law system. Today, the U.S. insurance industry has the most influence on the global insurance industry. In addition, some insurance policies in Korea still use English insurance policies used in the United States. In light of these facts, the laws and regulations of the United States may have implications for revising or interpreting the Korean insurance law. \nA thorough understanding of the laws on the duty of disclosure requires a complete understanding of the unique landscape of U.S. law. It also requires a deep understanding of the various systems and doctrines that are historical deposits of more than 170 years of U.S. insurance law. In this article, it would only be possible to present some 50 states' laws and cases on the duty of disclosure. Therefore, this paper is limited to summarizing the issues common to each state. The author will provide a more detailed discussion of U.S. laws and cases by studying each issue.","PeriodicalId":129340,"journal":{"name":"Korean Insurance Law Association","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Insurance Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2023.17.2.075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The duty of disclosure became a doctrine of insurance contracts in 1766 with the decision in Carter v. Boehm and was codified in the U.K. Marine Insurance Act(MIA) of 1906. Since then, insurance laws in every country have provided provisions for the duty of disclosure. The specifics of the duty of disclosure have evolved over time as the interpretation of good faith in insurance contracts and the need to address moral hazard in underwriting have changed from country to country and era to era. Today, however, the duty of disclosure continues to be debated in every country, and the United States is no exception. The United States dutifully followed English law in the early years of its founding. Over the centuries, it has become part of Anglo-American law. However, it has also developed a significant amount of its law based on the needs and unique circumstances of American society. Insurance law in the United States is no different. Currently, U.S. state laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure differ from the U.K. laws, which were amended in 2012 and 2015. In addition, insurance laws and precedents are often different in each state in the United States. British laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure have been steadily and continuously introduced in Korea. However, it seems that no article in Korea provides a detailed introduction to the laws and regulations on the duty of disclosure in the United States. Although Korean insurance law belongs to the civil law system, the laws on the duty of disclosure rely very little on the difference in the law system. Today, the U.S. insurance industry has the most influence on the global insurance industry. In addition, some insurance policies in Korea still use English insurance policies used in the United States. In light of these facts, the laws and regulations of the United States may have implications for revising or interpreting the Korean insurance law. A thorough understanding of the laws on the duty of disclosure requires a complete understanding of the unique landscape of U.S. law. It also requires a deep understanding of the various systems and doctrines that are historical deposits of more than 170 years of U.S. insurance law. In this article, it would only be possible to present some 50 states' laws and cases on the duty of disclosure. Therefore, this paper is limited to summarizing the issues common to each state. The author will provide a more detailed discussion of U.S. laws and cases by studying each issue.
美国保险法中的信息披露义务研究
1766年,随着卡特诉Boehm案的判决,披露义务成为保险合同的一项原则,并被编入1906年英国海上保险法(MIA)。此后,各国保险法都对信息披露义务作出了规定。披露义务的具体内容随着时间的推移而演变,因为保险合同中对诚信的解释以及解决承保中道德风险的需要在不同的国家和时代发生了变化。然而,今天,每个国家都在继续讨论披露的义务,美国也不例外。美国在建国初期忠实地遵循英国法律。几个世纪以来,它已成为英美法律的一部分。然而,它也根据美国社会的需要和独特环境制定了大量的法律。美国的保险法也不例外。目前,美国各州关于信息披露义务的法律法规与英国不同,英国分别于2012年和2015年进行了修订。此外,美国各州的保险法和判例往往不同。在韩国,英国的公开义务相关法律法规也在不断被引进。但是,国内似乎没有一篇文章详细介绍美国的公开义务法律法规。韩国保险法虽然属于大陆法系,但关于披露义务的法律对法系差异的依赖甚少。今天,美国保险业对全球保险业的影响最大。此外,韩国的一些保险仍然使用美国的英语保险单。鉴于这些事实,美国的法律法规可能会对修改或解释韩国保险法产生影响。要彻底了解披露义务的法律,就必须全面了解美国法律的独特景观。它还需要深刻理解各种制度和理论,这些制度和理论是170多年来美国保险法的历史沉淀。在这篇文章中,我们只能列举大约50个州关于信息披露义务的法律和案例。因此,本文仅限于对各个州共同存在的问题进行总结。作者将通过研究每个问题,对美国法律和案例进行更详细的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信