The Entrepreneurial Responsibilities Test

Jooho Lee
{"title":"The Entrepreneurial Responsibilities Test","authors":"Jooho Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2954098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a three-part test to help simplify worker classification and connect the law with the overall purposes of our economic system. Existing legal tests struggle to provide justifiable and workable guidance for courts, employers, and workers. One recent response has been an increased focus on entrepreneurship. However, neither courts nor scholars have paid sufficient attention to economic theories of entrepreneurship to inform their reliance on the concept. By drawing from classic economic theories of entrepreneurship, this paper will argue that a worker should be considered an employee unless she assumes entrepreneurial responsibility within her economic relationship with the hirer and that entrepreneurial responsibility consists of three elements: (1) the assumption of liability for economic uncertainty; (2) the exercise of control over the allocation of resources being combined to sell in the market; and (3) participation in the market discovery process by buying resources to sell in the market in the pursuit of profits. \nAside from its simplicity and wide-ranging applicability, the proposed three-part test is superior to other existing tests for employee status because it corresponds with the principle of fair play and the very reasons why we organize our economic activities within markets and firms. Because our economic system is a cooperative enterprise within which we organize our economic activity into markets and firms so that we can all benefit from an efficient allocation of resources, the principle of fair play suggests that it would be unfair for economic actors to benefit privately by circumventing the bifurcation of work into markets and firms in our economic system. This principle can explain and justify a wide variety of the need for distinguishing employees from independent contractors in a parsimonious and unified way.","PeriodicalId":129360,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Corporate Law & Organization Law (Topic)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Corporate Law & Organization Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2954098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper proposes a three-part test to help simplify worker classification and connect the law with the overall purposes of our economic system. Existing legal tests struggle to provide justifiable and workable guidance for courts, employers, and workers. One recent response has been an increased focus on entrepreneurship. However, neither courts nor scholars have paid sufficient attention to economic theories of entrepreneurship to inform their reliance on the concept. By drawing from classic economic theories of entrepreneurship, this paper will argue that a worker should be considered an employee unless she assumes entrepreneurial responsibility within her economic relationship with the hirer and that entrepreneurial responsibility consists of three elements: (1) the assumption of liability for economic uncertainty; (2) the exercise of control over the allocation of resources being combined to sell in the market; and (3) participation in the market discovery process by buying resources to sell in the market in the pursuit of profits. Aside from its simplicity and wide-ranging applicability, the proposed three-part test is superior to other existing tests for employee status because it corresponds with the principle of fair play and the very reasons why we organize our economic activities within markets and firms. Because our economic system is a cooperative enterprise within which we organize our economic activity into markets and firms so that we can all benefit from an efficient allocation of resources, the principle of fair play suggests that it would be unfair for economic actors to benefit privately by circumventing the bifurcation of work into markets and firms in our economic system. This principle can explain and justify a wide variety of the need for distinguishing employees from independent contractors in a parsimonious and unified way.
企业家责任测试
本文提出了一个由三部分组成的测试,以帮助简化工人分类,并将法律与我们经济体系的总体目标联系起来。现有的法律测试难以为法院、雇主和工人提供合理和可行的指导。最近的一个反应是越来越关注创业精神。然而,无论是法院还是学者都没有对企业家精神的经济理论给予足够的重视,以告知他们对这一概念的依赖。通过借鉴经典的创业经济学理论,本文将论证一个工人应该被视为雇员,除非她在与雇主的经济关系中承担了创业责任,而创业责任包括三个要素:(1)承担经济不确定性的责任;(二)对在市场上合并销售的资源配置实施控制;(3)参与市场发现过程,通过购买资源在市场上出售来追求利润。除了其简单性和广泛适用性外,拟议的三部分测试优于现有的其他雇员地位测试,因为它符合公平竞争原则,也符合我们在市场和公司内组织经济活动的原因。因为我们的经济体系是一个合作企业,在这个企业中,我们将经济活动组织成市场和企业,以便我们都能从有效的资源配置中受益,公平竞争原则表明,经济行为者通过规避我们的经济体系中市场和企业的工作分岔而获得私人利益是不公平的。这一原则可以解释和证明以一种简洁和统一的方式区分雇员和独立承包商的各种需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信