Landscape History and Ecological Change

N. Christensen
{"title":"Landscape History and Ecological Change","authors":"N. Christensen","doi":"10.2307/4005121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"N orth American ecologists have a long tradition of studying \"natural\" or undisturbed ecosystems. In addition to the innate affection for wilderness that likely initially enticed most ecologists to their discipline, practical reasons have prompted this focus. Ecologists seek to identify and understand the factors regulating the distribution and abundance of organisms. Interpreting the complex relationships between organisms and their environments is complicated by the variation in ecological communities caused by disturbances and past human interventions. Ecologists can control the effects of these external variables on their research by studying undisturbed ecosystems. Yet ecologists have for some time recognized that their concentration on natural ecosystems is, in many cases, rather naive or even misleading. During the past several years, the emphasis of their research has shifted to the consequences of past historical events for the current structure and function of ecosystems. Several factors account for this shift. First, it has become obvious that the research emanating from the focus on natural ecosystems suffers from serious limitations. Although statistically significant relationships","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4005121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

N orth American ecologists have a long tradition of studying "natural" or undisturbed ecosystems. In addition to the innate affection for wilderness that likely initially enticed most ecologists to their discipline, practical reasons have prompted this focus. Ecologists seek to identify and understand the factors regulating the distribution and abundance of organisms. Interpreting the complex relationships between organisms and their environments is complicated by the variation in ecological communities caused by disturbances and past human interventions. Ecologists can control the effects of these external variables on their research by studying undisturbed ecosystems. Yet ecologists have for some time recognized that their concentration on natural ecosystems is, in many cases, rather naive or even misleading. During the past several years, the emphasis of their research has shifted to the consequences of past historical events for the current structure and function of ecosystems. Several factors account for this shift. First, it has become obvious that the research emanating from the focus on natural ecosystems suffers from serious limitations. Although statistically significant relationships
景观历史与生态变化
北美生态学家研究“自然”或未受干扰的生态系统有着悠久的传统。除了最初可能吸引大多数生态学家进入这门学科的对荒野的天生喜爱之外,实际原因也促使了这种关注。生态学家试图识别和理解调节生物分布和丰度的因素。由于干扰和过去的人类干预导致生态群落的变化,解释生物与其环境之间的复杂关系变得更加复杂。生态学家可以通过研究未受干扰的生态系统来控制这些外部变量对他们研究的影响。然而,生态学家一段时间以来已经认识到,他们对自然生态系统的关注在许多情况下是相当幼稚的,甚至是误导性的。在过去的几年里,他们的研究重点已经转移到过去的历史事件对当前生态系统结构和功能的影响。有几个因素可以解释这种转变。首先,以自然生态系统为中心的研究显然存在严重的局限性。尽管统计上有显著的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信