ENHANCING STUDENTS CRITICAL READING SKILLS IN TEACHING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY

R. Manuputty
{"title":"ENHANCING STUDENTS CRITICAL READING SKILLS IN TEACHING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY","authors":"R. Manuputty","doi":"10.30598/tahurivol19issue1page36-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stereotypically, the teaching of writing is separated from reading subjects. As the results, many students are found to be passive and not critical in writing.  This action research looks into the effectiveness of enhancing students’ critical reading in writing argumentative essays. It is investigating whether the genre-based cognitive reading and approach applied brings significant impacts in students’ writing ability?  The results of the study indicated some moderate changes in writing argumentative skills which were analyzed and assessed through content analysis over two complete writing products submitted after two complete learning cycles. Some students of (N=18) are at developing learning stage of becoming critical in writing but not yet fluently in making strong arguments for their opinions. Some have already shown capability to organize their thoughts better in thesis writing but not successfully developed them with facts from their own factual experiences in supporting and defending their stands and arguments in development writing stage. The instructional learning system is found to be effective though obviously much time is needed for comprehending texts, and more writing practice is required before students can eventually perform better argumentative essays","PeriodicalId":294571,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL TAHURI","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL TAHURI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol19issue1page36-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotypically, the teaching of writing is separated from reading subjects. As the results, many students are found to be passive and not critical in writing.  This action research looks into the effectiveness of enhancing students’ critical reading in writing argumentative essays. It is investigating whether the genre-based cognitive reading and approach applied brings significant impacts in students’ writing ability?  The results of the study indicated some moderate changes in writing argumentative skills which were analyzed and assessed through content analysis over two complete writing products submitted after two complete learning cycles. Some students of (N=18) are at developing learning stage of becoming critical in writing but not yet fluently in making strong arguments for their opinions. Some have already shown capability to organize their thoughts better in thesis writing but not successfully developed them with facts from their own factual experiences in supporting and defending their stands and arguments in development writing stage. The instructional learning system is found to be effective though obviously much time is needed for comprehending texts, and more writing practice is required before students can eventually perform better argumentative essays
在议论文教学中提高学生的批判性阅读能力
传统上,写作教学与阅读教学是分开的。结果,许多学生在写作中被发现是被动的,没有批判性。本行动研究探讨了在议论文写作中提高学生批判性阅读能力的有效性。基于体裁的认知阅读和方法的应用是否对学生的写作能力有显著的影响?研究结果表明,在两个完整的学习周期后,通过对提交的两个完整的写作产品的内容分析和评估,写作论证技巧发生了一些适度的变化。有些学生(N=18)正处于写作批判的发展阶段,但还不能流利地为自己的观点提出有力的论据。有些人已经表现出在论文写作中更好地组织思想的能力,但在发展写作阶段,他们没有成功地利用自己的事实经验来支持和捍卫自己的立场和论点。教学系统被发现是有效的,尽管显然需要很多时间来理解文本,并且在学生最终能够更好地完成议论文之前,需要更多的写作练习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信