Quebec's Module D'Enregistrement Des Ventes (MEV): Fighting the Zapper, Phantomware and Tax Fraud with Technology

R. T. Ainsworth
{"title":"Quebec's Module D'Enregistrement Des Ventes (MEV): Fighting the Zapper, Phantomware and Tax Fraud with Technology","authors":"R. T. Ainsworth","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1345123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On January 28, 2008 the Quebec Minister of Revenue, Jean-Marc Fournier, announced that by late 2009 the MRQ will begin testing a device, the module d'enregistrement des ventes (MEV) that is projected to substantially reduce tax fraud in the restaurant sector. By 2010 or 2011 MEVs will be mandatory in all Quebec restaurants, where they will assure accuracy and retention of business records within electronic cash registers (ECRs). This paper moves beyond a discussion of the variety of sales suppression programs in use - zappers and phantom-ware. The concern here is on enforcement efforts, particularly the MEV. The intent is to assess the workability and effectiveness of the MEV solution by contrasting it with solutions adopted elsewhere. Two policy orientations guide enforcement actions in this area - one approach is rules-based; the other is principles-based. They are not mutually exclusive - degrees of blending are common. Rules-based jurisdictions adopt comprehensive and mandatory legislation regulating, and/ or certifying cash registers. Jurisdictions taking this approach include Greece and Germany. With the adoption of the MEV, Quebec will also fall within this group. Principles-based jurisdictions rely on compliant taxpayers following the rules. Compliance is enforced with an enhanced audit regime. The Netherlands and the UK fall into this group. After presenting a rough schematic of a how a zapper or phantom-ware facilitates a skimming fraud (absent many of the details considered in earlier papers), this paper will consider three rules-based enforcement approaches: the Greek \"fiscal electronic devices\" or FEDs, the Quebec MEVs and the German \"smart cards.\" The Dutch principles-based approach which is also favored by the UK will provide a policy contrast. A final section will consider how CSPs in a SSUTA framework could be used to achieve very similar outcomes as is currently realized under either the rules-based or principles-based approaches. CSPs in a SSUTA context blend the rules-based and principles-based approach within a unique (private sector) solution.","PeriodicalId":376821,"journal":{"name":"White Collar Crime eJournal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"White Collar Crime eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1345123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On January 28, 2008 the Quebec Minister of Revenue, Jean-Marc Fournier, announced that by late 2009 the MRQ will begin testing a device, the module d'enregistrement des ventes (MEV) that is projected to substantially reduce tax fraud in the restaurant sector. By 2010 or 2011 MEVs will be mandatory in all Quebec restaurants, where they will assure accuracy and retention of business records within electronic cash registers (ECRs). This paper moves beyond a discussion of the variety of sales suppression programs in use - zappers and phantom-ware. The concern here is on enforcement efforts, particularly the MEV. The intent is to assess the workability and effectiveness of the MEV solution by contrasting it with solutions adopted elsewhere. Two policy orientations guide enforcement actions in this area - one approach is rules-based; the other is principles-based. They are not mutually exclusive - degrees of blending are common. Rules-based jurisdictions adopt comprehensive and mandatory legislation regulating, and/ or certifying cash registers. Jurisdictions taking this approach include Greece and Germany. With the adoption of the MEV, Quebec will also fall within this group. Principles-based jurisdictions rely on compliant taxpayers following the rules. Compliance is enforced with an enhanced audit regime. The Netherlands and the UK fall into this group. After presenting a rough schematic of a how a zapper or phantom-ware facilitates a skimming fraud (absent many of the details considered in earlier papers), this paper will consider three rules-based enforcement approaches: the Greek "fiscal electronic devices" or FEDs, the Quebec MEVs and the German "smart cards." The Dutch principles-based approach which is also favored by the UK will provide a policy contrast. A final section will consider how CSPs in a SSUTA framework could be used to achieve very similar outcomes as is currently realized under either the rules-based or principles-based approaches. CSPs in a SSUTA context blend the rules-based and principles-based approach within a unique (private sector) solution.
魁北克的模块注册Des Ventes (MEV):用技术打击Zapper,幻影软件和税务欺诈
2008年1月28日,魁北克税务部长Jean-Marc Fournier宣布,到2009年底,MRQ将开始测试一种设备,即MEV模块,预计将大大减少餐饮业的税务欺诈。到2010年或2011年,mev将在魁北克的所有餐馆强制执行,在那里他们将确保电子收银机(ecr)中业务记录的准确性和保存性。本文超越了讨论各种销售抑制程序在使用- zappers和幽灵软件。这里的问题在于执法力度,尤其是环境保护部。目的是通过与其他地方采用的解决方案进行对比,评估MEV解决方案的可操作性和有效性。两种政策导向指导这一领域的执法行动——一种是以规则为基础的;另一个是基于原则的。它们不是相互排斥的——混合程度是常见的。以规则为基础的司法管辖区采用全面和强制性的立法来监管和/或认证收银机。采取这种做法的司法管辖区包括希腊和德国。随着MEV的采用,魁北克也将属于这一群体。以原则为基础的司法管辖区依赖于遵守规则的合规纳税人。通过加强审计制度来强制执行合规性。荷兰和英国就属于这一类。在给出了一个关于zapper或phantom ware如何促进略读欺诈的粗略示意图(缺少之前论文中考虑的许多细节)之后,本文将考虑三种基于规则的执行方法:希腊的“财政电子设备”或联邦政府,魁北克的mev和德国的“智能卡”。荷兰以原则为基础的方法也受到英国的青睐,这将提供一种政策对比。最后一节将考虑如何使用SSUTA框架中的csp来实现与目前在基于规则或基于原则的方法下实现的非常相似的结果。在SSUTA背景下,csp在一个独特的(私营部门)解决方案中混合了基于规则和基于原则的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信