Implicit Simile and its Quranic Examples in the Scholarship of Eloquence between Acceptance and Rejection

Nazeeh Elawi, Ali Alswaeer
{"title":"Implicit Simile and its Quranic Examples in the Scholarship of Eloquence between Acceptance and Rejection","authors":"Nazeeh Elawi, Ali Alswaeer","doi":"10.35682/jjall.v18i4.570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to prove that the so-called implicit simile among scholars of eloquence was not classified in its correct eloquence category, and that this type of simile is in fact an attempt of some poets to use a pattern of proof that deceives the recipient that there is a similarity between two elements. The study also aims to prove that what has been mentioned in some recent studies as examples of implicit simile from the Qur’an cannot be classified as such, by testing these Qur’anic examples against the established definitions of simile by eloquence scholars, and by reviewing these examples based on the Qur’anic approach and its method of determining facts. The study relied on the descriptive analytical approach. This is done by reviewing the definitions and examples provided by the scholars of eloquence studies for this type of simile, and by reviewing the Qur’anic examples that are supposed to be illustrations of this type of simile. The study then provides a critical review of these definitions and examples. The most important result of this study is the need to reconsider the classification of \"implicit simile\" and place it in an eloquence category other than the category of simile, and to reconsider the Qur'anic examples cited by some scholars as illustrations of this type of simile.","PeriodicalId":348263,"journal":{"name":"The Jordan Journal for Arabic language and literature","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jordan Journal for Arabic language and literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35682/jjall.v18i4.570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to prove that the so-called implicit simile among scholars of eloquence was not classified in its correct eloquence category, and that this type of simile is in fact an attempt of some poets to use a pattern of proof that deceives the recipient that there is a similarity between two elements. The study also aims to prove that what has been mentioned in some recent studies as examples of implicit simile from the Qur’an cannot be classified as such, by testing these Qur’anic examples against the established definitions of simile by eloquence scholars, and by reviewing these examples based on the Qur’anic approach and its method of determining facts. The study relied on the descriptive analytical approach. This is done by reviewing the definitions and examples provided by the scholars of eloquence studies for this type of simile, and by reviewing the Qur’anic examples that are supposed to be illustrations of this type of simile. The study then provides a critical review of these definitions and examples. The most important result of this study is the need to reconsider the classification of "implicit simile" and place it in an eloquence category other than the category of simile, and to reconsider the Qur'anic examples cited by some scholars as illustrations of this type of simile.
《接受与拒绝之间的雄辩学》中的含蓄明喻及其《古兰经》实例
本研究旨在证明,在口才学者中所谓的含蓄明喻并没有被归入其正确的口才范畴,这种类型的明喻实际上是一些诗人试图使用一种证明模式来欺骗接受者,使其认为两种元素之间存在相似之处。本研究还旨在证明,最近的一些研究中提到的《古兰经》中隐含明喻的例子不能被归类为这样的例子,通过将这些《古兰经》中的例子与雄辩学者对明喻的既定定义进行对比,并根据《古兰经》的方法及其确定事实的方法来回顾这些例子。这项研究依靠描述性分析方法。这是通过回顾由口才研究学者为这类明喻提供的定义和例子来完成的,通过回顾古兰经中的例子,这些例子被认为是这类明喻的例证。然后,本研究对这些定义和例子进行了批判性的回顾。本研究最重要的结果是需要重新考虑“隐含明喻”的分类,将其置于明喻范畴之外的口才范畴,并重新考虑一些学者引用的古兰经例子作为这类明喻的例证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信