Advancing our understanding of immigrants’ trust in police: the role of ethnicity, immigrant generational status and measurement

Mohammed M. Ali, Kristina Murphy, E. Sargeant
{"title":"Advancing our understanding of immigrants’ trust in police: the role of ethnicity, immigrant generational status and measurement","authors":"Mohammed M. Ali, Kristina Murphy, E. Sargeant","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2022.2085267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies of immigrant populations point to numerous immigrant-specific factors that may explain their level of trust in police. Yet research on immigrants’ trust in police remains sparse, and available studies present contradictory findings. Some studies find that immigrants are more trusting of police than non-immigrants, while other studies find immigrants are less trusting of police. We argue that these contradictions can be explained by three factors: (1) how trust is measured; (2) immigrants’ ethnic group (e.g. minority vs non-minority); and (3) immigrants’ generational status (i.e. 1st vs. 2nd generation immigrant). To address these contradictions, we draw on survey data from 903 immigrants living in Sydney, Australia. We examine the relationship between ethnicity, immigrant generational status and various measures of trust in police. We find when trust is measured as an overarching orientation, minority immigrants tend to distrust police more than non-minority immigrants, and that 2nd generation immigrants are more distrusting than 1st generation immigrants. However, these findings vary when measuring trust multi-dimensionally and when accounting for the interaction between ethnicity and generational status. Implications for immigrant research and police practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":243832,"journal":{"name":"Policing and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2085267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies of immigrant populations point to numerous immigrant-specific factors that may explain their level of trust in police. Yet research on immigrants’ trust in police remains sparse, and available studies present contradictory findings. Some studies find that immigrants are more trusting of police than non-immigrants, while other studies find immigrants are less trusting of police. We argue that these contradictions can be explained by three factors: (1) how trust is measured; (2) immigrants’ ethnic group (e.g. minority vs non-minority); and (3) immigrants’ generational status (i.e. 1st vs. 2nd generation immigrant). To address these contradictions, we draw on survey data from 903 immigrants living in Sydney, Australia. We examine the relationship between ethnicity, immigrant generational status and various measures of trust in police. We find when trust is measured as an overarching orientation, minority immigrants tend to distrust police more than non-minority immigrants, and that 2nd generation immigrants are more distrusting than 1st generation immigrants. However, these findings vary when measuring trust multi-dimensionally and when accounting for the interaction between ethnicity and generational status. Implications for immigrant research and police practice are discussed.
增进我们对移民对警察信任的理解:种族、移民代际地位和测量的作用
对移民人口的研究指出了许多移民特有的因素可以解释他们对警察的信任程度。然而,关于移民对警察信任的研究仍然很少,现有的研究显示出相互矛盾的结果。一些研究发现,移民比非移民更信任警察,而另一些研究发现,移民对警察的信任程度较低。我们认为,这些矛盾可以用三个因素来解释:(1)如何衡量信任;(2)移民的族群(如少数民族与非少数民族);(3)移民的代际地位(即第一代与第二代移民)。为了解决这些矛盾,我们借鉴了居住在澳大利亚悉尼的903名移民的调查数据。我们研究了种族、移民代际地位和对警察的各种信任措施之间的关系。我们发现,当信任作为一个总体取向来衡量时,少数族裔移民比非少数族裔移民更倾向于不信任警察,第二代移民比第一代移民更不信任警察。然而,当多维度测量信任以及考虑种族和代际地位之间的相互作用时,这些发现有所不同。对移民研究和警察实践的启示进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信