S. Haude, Shabnam Salehi, Sof'ia Vidal, M. Maturi, Matthias Bartelmann Theoretical Astrophysics, Zah, H. University, T. Physics
{"title":"Model-independent determination of the cosmic growth factor","authors":"S. Haude, Shabnam Salehi, Sof'ia Vidal, M. Maturi, Matthias Bartelmann Theoretical Astrophysics, Zah, H. University, T. Physics","doi":"10.21468/scipostastro.2.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two most important functions describing the evolution of the\nuniverse and its structures are the expansion function\nE(a)E(a)\nand the linear growth factor D_+(a)D+(a).\nIt is desirable to constrain them based on a minimum of assumptions in\norder to avoid biases from assumed cosmological models. The expansion\nfunction has been determined in previous papers in a model-independent\nway using distance moduli to type-Ia supernovae and assuming only a\nmetric theory of gravity, spatial isotropy and homogeneity. Here, we\nextend this analysis in three ways: (1) We enlarge the data sample by\ncombining measurements of type-Ia supernovae with measurements of\nbaryonic acoustic oscillations; (2) we substantially simplify and\ngeneralise our method for reconstructing the expansion function; and (3)\nwe use the reconstructed expansion function to determine the linear\ngrowth factor of cosmic structures, equally independent of specific\nassumptions on an underlying cosmological model other than the usual\nspatial symmetries. In this approach, the present-day matter-density\nparameter \\Omega_\\mathrm{m0}Ωm0\nis the only relevant parameter for an otherwise purely empirical and\naccurate determination of the growth factor. We further show how our\nmethod can be used to derive a possible time evolution of the dark\nenergy as well as the growth index directly from distance measurements.\nDeviations from \\LambdaΛCDM\nthat we see in some of our results may be due to possibly insufficient\nflexibility of our method that could be cured by larger data samples, a\nreal departure from \\LambdaΛCDM\nat a\\lesssim0.3a≲0.3,\nor hidden systematics in the data. The latter could be a matter of\nconcern for all type-Ia supernovae analyses based on\n\\LambdaΛCDM\nfitting approaches, especially in view of the current dispute on the\nvalue of H_0H0.\nThese results illustrate the applicability of our approach as a\ndiagnostic tool.","PeriodicalId":194640,"journal":{"name":"SciPost Astronomy","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciPost Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostastro.2.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The two most important functions describing the evolution of the
universe and its structures are the expansion function
E(a)E(a)
and the linear growth factor D_+(a)D+(a).
It is desirable to constrain them based on a minimum of assumptions in
order to avoid biases from assumed cosmological models. The expansion
function has been determined in previous papers in a model-independent
way using distance moduli to type-Ia supernovae and assuming only a
metric theory of gravity, spatial isotropy and homogeneity. Here, we
extend this analysis in three ways: (1) We enlarge the data sample by
combining measurements of type-Ia supernovae with measurements of
baryonic acoustic oscillations; (2) we substantially simplify and
generalise our method for reconstructing the expansion function; and (3)
we use the reconstructed expansion function to determine the linear
growth factor of cosmic structures, equally independent of specific
assumptions on an underlying cosmological model other than the usual
spatial symmetries. In this approach, the present-day matter-density
parameter \Omega_\mathrm{m0}Ωm0
is the only relevant parameter for an otherwise purely empirical and
accurate determination of the growth factor. We further show how our
method can be used to derive a possible time evolution of the dark
energy as well as the growth index directly from distance measurements.
Deviations from \LambdaΛCDM
that we see in some of our results may be due to possibly insufficient
flexibility of our method that could be cured by larger data samples, a
real departure from \LambdaΛCDM
at a\lesssim0.3a≲0.3,
or hidden systematics in the data. The latter could be a matter of
concern for all type-Ia supernovae analyses based on
\LambdaΛCDM
fitting approaches, especially in view of the current dispute on the
value of H_0H0.
These results illustrate the applicability of our approach as a
diagnostic tool.