A machine learning approach for calibrating seismic interval velocity in 3D velocity model

H. Le, D. Tran, Van Tien Nguyen, Dac The Nguyen
{"title":"A machine learning approach for calibrating seismic interval velocity in 3D velocity model","authors":"H. Le, D. Tran, Van Tien Nguyen, Dac The Nguyen","doi":"10.47800/pvj.2022.10-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Velocity model technique is routinely used to convert data from the time-to-depth domain to support prospect evaluation, reservoir modelling, well engineering, and further drilling operation. In Vietnam, the conventional velocity model building workflow oversimplifies the interval velocities as only well interval velocities are populated into 2D grids for depth conversion or oversimplified calibration interval velocities by applying a single scaling factor function. This study explores the 3D velocity model workflow to obtain accurate and high-resolution interval velocities using a machine learning approach for both fields A and B in Cuu Long basin, offshore Vietnam. \nTo design an effective approach to depth conversion, the anisotropy factor analysis was performed to understand the differences between the seismic and well interval velocities in geological layer in the 3D structural model. The seismic interval velocity was multiplied by the anisotropy factor to achieve the scaling seismic interval velocity. The scaling seismic interval velocity, elastic attributes, geometric attributes, structural and stratigraphic attributes were used as training features (variables) for predicting interval velocity using the supervised learning algorithm in the machine learning model. Supervised learning offers an opportunity to develop an expert-knowledge-based automated system, which incorporates both domain knowledge and quantitative data mining [1]. The random forest regression algorithms were selected for predicting interval velocity after evaluating several machine learning algorithms. To provide insight into the uncertainty of final interval velocity, a depth uncertainty analysis was conducted using a blind well test for 24 wells and 7 horizons. \nThe comprehensive 3D velocity model using machine learning approach was built for the first time in Cuu Long basin, offshore Vietnam. The result showed the machine learning algorithm can address the disadvantages of conventional velocity calibration to create highly accurate depth representations of the subsurface including a measure of the uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":294988,"journal":{"name":"Petrovietnam Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrovietnam Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47800/pvj.2022.10-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Velocity model technique is routinely used to convert data from the time-to-depth domain to support prospect evaluation, reservoir modelling, well engineering, and further drilling operation. In Vietnam, the conventional velocity model building workflow oversimplifies the interval velocities as only well interval velocities are populated into 2D grids for depth conversion or oversimplified calibration interval velocities by applying a single scaling factor function. This study explores the 3D velocity model workflow to obtain accurate and high-resolution interval velocities using a machine learning approach for both fields A and B in Cuu Long basin, offshore Vietnam. To design an effective approach to depth conversion, the anisotropy factor analysis was performed to understand the differences between the seismic and well interval velocities in geological layer in the 3D structural model. The seismic interval velocity was multiplied by the anisotropy factor to achieve the scaling seismic interval velocity. The scaling seismic interval velocity, elastic attributes, geometric attributes, structural and stratigraphic attributes were used as training features (variables) for predicting interval velocity using the supervised learning algorithm in the machine learning model. Supervised learning offers an opportunity to develop an expert-knowledge-based automated system, which incorporates both domain knowledge and quantitative data mining [1]. The random forest regression algorithms were selected for predicting interval velocity after evaluating several machine learning algorithms. To provide insight into the uncertainty of final interval velocity, a depth uncertainty analysis was conducted using a blind well test for 24 wells and 7 horizons. The comprehensive 3D velocity model using machine learning approach was built for the first time in Cuu Long basin, offshore Vietnam. The result showed the machine learning algorithm can address the disadvantages of conventional velocity calibration to create highly accurate depth representations of the subsurface including a measure of the uncertainty.
三维速度模型中地震层速度标定的机器学习方法
速度模型技术通常用于转换时间-深度域的数据,以支持前景评估、油藏建模、井工程和进一步的钻井作业。在越南,传统的速度模型建立工作流程过度简化了层速度,因为只有井层速度被填充到二维网格中进行深度转换,或者通过应用单一比例因子函数过度简化了校准层速度。该研究探索了3D速度模型工作流程,利用机器学习方法获得越南Cuu Long盆地a和B油田的精确和高分辨率层速。为了设计一种有效的深度转换方法,进行了各向异性因素分析,以了解三维结构模型中地质层地震和井间速度之间的差异。将地震层速度与各向异性因子相乘,得到尺度地震层速度。利用机器学习模型中的监督学习算法,将尺度地震层速度、弹性属性、几何属性、构造和地层属性作为预测层速度的训练特征(变量)。监督学习为开发基于专家知识的自动化系统提供了机会,该系统结合了领域知识和定量数据挖掘[1]。在评估了几种机器学习算法后,选择随机森林回归算法来预测区间速度。为了深入了解最终层速的不确定性,对24口井和7个层位进行了盲井测试,进行了深度不确定性分析。首次使用机器学习方法在越南近海Cuu Long盆地建立了全面的三维速度模型。结果表明,机器学习算法可以解决传统速度校准的缺点,以创建高精度的地下深度表示,包括测量不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信