Fotogrametria, polityka i przedsiębiorczość a inwentaryzacja zabytków. Albrecht Meydenbauer w Poznańskiem w roku 1885 i 1887

E. Wojdak
{"title":"Fotogrametria, polityka i przedsiębiorczość a inwentaryzacja zabytków. Albrecht Meydenbauer w Poznańskiem w roku 1885 i 1887","authors":"E. Wojdak","doi":"10.14746/AQ.2018.29.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A standard belief as regards the conservation of architectural monuments in the 19thcentury is that the very idea of conservation was commonly accepted, while the monuments of the past were used to promote national identity. On the other hand, photography is also commonly considered a technology that was naturally predisposed to popularize those monuments and/or appropriate them as symbols. For those reasons, the photogrammetric documentation of some buildings from the region of Poznań, made by Albrecht Meydenbauer commissioned to do it by the Prussian government, could be classified as combination of conservation and nationalism, “typical” of the late 19thcentury. However, the author proposes another interpretation and claims that such events were not necessarily “realizations” of “widespread” ideas of identity building. Referring to the generative model of identity building developed by Friedrik Barth, she analyzes how specific situations and meanings were gradually generated through the interaction of actors who attempted to reach their goals and values by available means. The introduction and popularization of Meydenbauer’s invention is presented in the paper with reference to Bruno Latour’s research on the development and implementation of innovations in science. In such a context, photogrammetry turns out to have been a result of seeking support by business, i.e. the mobilization of resources, while the national discourse was used for that purpose as one of the available means.","PeriodicalId":345400,"journal":{"name":"Artium Quaestiones","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artium Quaestiones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/AQ.2018.29.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standard belief as regards the conservation of architectural monuments in the 19thcentury is that the very idea of conservation was commonly accepted, while the monuments of the past were used to promote national identity. On the other hand, photography is also commonly considered a technology that was naturally predisposed to popularize those monuments and/or appropriate them as symbols. For those reasons, the photogrammetric documentation of some buildings from the region of Poznań, made by Albrecht Meydenbauer commissioned to do it by the Prussian government, could be classified as combination of conservation and nationalism, “typical” of the late 19thcentury. However, the author proposes another interpretation and claims that such events were not necessarily “realizations” of “widespread” ideas of identity building. Referring to the generative model of identity building developed by Friedrik Barth, she analyzes how specific situations and meanings were gradually generated through the interaction of actors who attempted to reach their goals and values by available means. The introduction and popularization of Meydenbauer’s invention is presented in the paper with reference to Bruno Latour’s research on the development and implementation of innovations in science. In such a context, photogrammetry turns out to have been a result of seeking support by business, i.e. the mobilization of resources, while the national discourse was used for that purpose as one of the available means.
关于19世纪建筑古迹的保护,一个标准的看法是,保护的概念是被普遍接受的,而过去的古迹是用来促进民族认同的。另一方面,摄影也通常被认为是一种自然倾向于普及这些纪念碑和/或将它们作为象征的技术。基于这些原因,由Albrecht Meydenbauer受普鲁士政府委托制作的波兹纳伊地区一些建筑的摄影测量文献,可以被归类为保护和民族主义的结合,是19世纪晚期的“典型”。然而,作者提出了另一种解释,并声称这些事件不一定是“实现”“普遍”的身份建设理念。她参考了巴特(Friedrik Barth)提出的身份建构生成模型,分析了通过行动者之间的互动,特定情境和意义是如何逐渐产生的,这些行动者试图通过可用的手段达到他们的目标和价值观。本文参考了布鲁诺·拉图尔关于科学创新的发展和实施的研究,介绍和推广了梅登鲍尔的发明。在这样的背景下,摄影测量被证明是企业寻求支持的结果,即调动资源,而国家话语被用作这一目的的可用手段之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信