TRENDS IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY AND ACCUMULATION OF INVESTMENT DISPROPORTIONS IN THE ECONOMY OF UKRAINE

N. Toropchenko, O. Trokhymets
{"title":"TRENDS IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY AND ACCUMULATION OF INVESTMENT DISPROPORTIONS IN THE ECONOMY OF UKRAINE","authors":"N. Toropchenko, O. Trokhymets","doi":"10.30525/2661-5169/2021-1-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine the trends of investment activity and the peculiarities of the disparities’ formation in the territorial and sectoral structure of such activity in Ukraine. Methodology. The Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between GDP dynamics and the ratio of gross capital formation in the economy has been used in the article. Considering the peculiarities of the change in the methodology of calculating GDP in Ukraine, it should be noted that GDP has been calculated according to the methodology of the 1993 SNA in the period 1996-1999; according to the methodology of the SNA 2008 in the period 2000-2013, GDP data have not considered the annexed Crimea and the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the period 2014-2020. It is advisable to use data from the World Bank to estimate the share of gross capital formation (in% of GDP), the set of which, in contrast to domestic statistics, fully covers the analyzed period. The choice for the beginning of the 1996 interval has been conditioned by the possibility of correct comparisons of data in a single currency. The source of GDP data is the State Statistics Service of Ukraine while the source of FDI data flows and stocks in Ukraine is the data of the National Bank of Ukraine (due to changes in the methodology of calculating FDI in 2018) Practical implications. The priorities of intensifying the investment support have been formulated (return of national capital to the jurisdiction of Ukraine, increase the uniformity of the territorial structure of capital investment, increase fixed capital formation to 20 +%, stimulate investment in military technology, NBIC convergence), including investments in science, education) based on the identified problems of investment support for the development of Ukraine's economy increasing the level of protection of property rights and guarantees of preferential treatment for investments. Value/originality. The main priorities of balanced development have been formulated (increasing the level of manufacturability of industry and services, import substitution in the production of investment and consumer goods, inclusion in global value chains, balancing the interests of large capital stakeholders, reducing dependence on external security shocks (military-political conflicts, pandemics), maintaining the level of social security, restoration of disturbed natural complexes, etc.)","PeriodicalId":185837,"journal":{"name":"Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2021-1-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the trends of investment activity and the peculiarities of the disparities’ formation in the territorial and sectoral structure of such activity in Ukraine. Methodology. The Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between GDP dynamics and the ratio of gross capital formation in the economy has been used in the article. Considering the peculiarities of the change in the methodology of calculating GDP in Ukraine, it should be noted that GDP has been calculated according to the methodology of the 1993 SNA in the period 1996-1999; according to the methodology of the SNA 2008 in the period 2000-2013, GDP data have not considered the annexed Crimea and the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the period 2014-2020. It is advisable to use data from the World Bank to estimate the share of gross capital formation (in% of GDP), the set of which, in contrast to domestic statistics, fully covers the analyzed period. The choice for the beginning of the 1996 interval has been conditioned by the possibility of correct comparisons of data in a single currency. The source of GDP data is the State Statistics Service of Ukraine while the source of FDI data flows and stocks in Ukraine is the data of the National Bank of Ukraine (due to changes in the methodology of calculating FDI in 2018) Practical implications. The priorities of intensifying the investment support have been formulated (return of national capital to the jurisdiction of Ukraine, increase the uniformity of the territorial structure of capital investment, increase fixed capital formation to 20 +%, stimulate investment in military technology, NBIC convergence), including investments in science, education) based on the identified problems of investment support for the development of Ukraine's economy increasing the level of protection of property rights and guarantees of preferential treatment for investments. Value/originality. The main priorities of balanced development have been formulated (increasing the level of manufacturability of industry and services, import substitution in the production of investment and consumer goods, inclusion in global value chains, balancing the interests of large capital stakeholders, reducing dependence on external security shocks (military-political conflicts, pandemics), maintaining the level of social security, restoration of disturbed natural complexes, etc.)
投资活动的趋势和乌克兰经济中投资不成比例的积累
这项研究的目的是确定投资活动的趋势和在乌克兰境内投资活动的领土和部门结构中形成差异的特点。方法。本文使用了皮尔逊相关系数来评估GDP动态与经济中总资本形成比率之间的关系。考虑到乌克兰国内生产总值计算方法变化的特点,应当指出,国内生产总值是根据1996-1999年期间1993国民核算体系的方法计算的;根据SNA 2008年2000-2013年期间的方法,GDP数据未考虑2014-2020年期间被吞并的克里米亚和暂时被占领的顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克地区。建议使用世界银行的数据来估计总资本形成的份额(占GDP的百分比),与国内统计数据相比,这一组数据完全涵盖了所分析的时期。选择1996年开始的时间间隔的条件是能否正确比较单一货币的数据。GDP数据的来源是乌克兰国家统计局,而乌克兰的外国直接投资数据流量和存量的来源是乌克兰国家银行的数据(由于2018年外国直接投资计算方法的变化)。已经制定了加强投资支持的优先事项(国家资本返回乌克兰管辖范围,增加资本投资地域结构的统一性,将固定资本形成率提高到20%以上,刺激军事技术投资,NBIC融合),包括科学投资,根据已确定的投资支持乌克兰经济发展的问题,提高产权保护水平和保障投资优惠待遇。价值/创意。已经制定了平衡发展的主要优先事项(提高工业和服务业的可制造性水平、投资和消费品生产的进口替代、纳入全球价值链、平衡大资本利益攸关方的利益、减少对外部安全冲击(军事政治冲突、流行病)的依赖、维持社会保障水平、恢复受干扰的自然复体,等等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信