Recovery of Rate Constants from Rank Deficient Kinetic Data: Comparison of MCR Approaches

A. Skvortsov, E. Savchenko
{"title":"Recovery of Rate Constants from Rank Deficient Kinetic Data: Comparison of MCR Approaches","authors":"A. Skvortsov, E. Savchenko","doi":"10.1109/EEXPOLYTECH.2018.8564421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of rate constants of various processes is crucial both for research and for industrial design. It is typically done by fitting kinetic models to experimental data, which are mostly multivariate nowadays. These data often bear ill properties like noise and/or rank deficiency, which may ruin the relevance of the obtained results. In the present work we tested the ability of three well defined multivariate curve resolution approaches (model-free MCR-ALS, model-based MCR-ALS and full-matrix non-linear least square fit) to recover rate constants from simple simulated kinetic data when the spectra of components are almost linearly dependent. Model-free estimation of concentrations produced incorrect estimates. Model-based analysis was possible, but the quality of estimates of rate constants and convergence were strongly degraded by rank deficiency. Full-matrix non-linear least square fit displayed the best results both with respect to accuracy of the estimates and calculation performance. It proved its known value of the method of choice. The quality of the estimates depended strongly on the ratio between the rate constants: cases with highly similar and highly dissimilar rate constants were more problematic. The reasons of poor convergence of ALS algorithms and sources of bias in the estimates of rate constants are discussed.","PeriodicalId":296618,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Photonics (EExPolytech)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Photonics (EExPolytech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEXPOLYTECH.2018.8564421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Measurement of rate constants of various processes is crucial both for research and for industrial design. It is typically done by fitting kinetic models to experimental data, which are mostly multivariate nowadays. These data often bear ill properties like noise and/or rank deficiency, which may ruin the relevance of the obtained results. In the present work we tested the ability of three well defined multivariate curve resolution approaches (model-free MCR-ALS, model-based MCR-ALS and full-matrix non-linear least square fit) to recover rate constants from simple simulated kinetic data when the spectra of components are almost linearly dependent. Model-free estimation of concentrations produced incorrect estimates. Model-based analysis was possible, but the quality of estimates of rate constants and convergence were strongly degraded by rank deficiency. Full-matrix non-linear least square fit displayed the best results both with respect to accuracy of the estimates and calculation performance. It proved its known value of the method of choice. The quality of the estimates depended strongly on the ratio between the rate constants: cases with highly similar and highly dissimilar rate constants were more problematic. The reasons of poor convergence of ALS algorithms and sources of bias in the estimates of rate constants are discussed.
从缺秩动力学数据中恢复速率常数:MCR方法的比较
测量各种过程的速率常数对于研究和工业设计都是至关重要的。它通常是通过将动力学模型拟合到实验数据中来完成的,而现在的实验数据大多是多元的。这些数据通常具有不良的特性,如噪声和/或秩不足,这可能会破坏所获得结果的相关性。在目前的工作中,我们测试了三种定义良好的多元曲线分辨率方法(无模型MCR-ALS,基于模型的MCR-ALS和全矩阵非线性最小二乘拟合)在组分光谱几乎线性依赖时从简单的模拟动力学数据中恢复速率常数的能力。无模型的浓度估计产生了不正确的估计。基于模型的分析是可能的,但速率常数和收敛性估计的质量因秩不足而严重降低。全矩阵非线性最小二乘拟合在估计精度和计算性能方面均表现出最好的结果。它证明了其选择方法的已知价值。估计的质量很大程度上取决于速率常数之间的比率:速率常数高度相似和高度不相似的情况更有问题。讨论了ALS算法收敛性差的原因和速率常数估计偏差的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信