Russia-Cyprus Relations: A Pragmatic Idealist Perspective by Costas Melakopides (review)

Petros Vamvakas
{"title":"Russia-Cyprus Relations: A Pragmatic Idealist Perspective by Costas Melakopides (review)","authors":"Petros Vamvakas","doi":"10.1215/10474552-4164314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set in the increasingly relevant and complex eastern Mediterranean, Costas Melakopides’s RussiaCyprus Relations: A Pragmatic Idealist Perspective, deals with a subject that has been overlooked in contemporary geopolitical literature. Through a chronological examination of the relationship between Russia and Cyprus, Melakopides attempts to make a strong statement on two levels. First, he provides a distinct theoretical insight into the motivations driving Russian foreign policy in the region, and second, he juxtaposes the Russian approach to that of Britain and the United States. Melakopides argues from what he describes as a “practical idealist” perspective. For him, this means that there are ideas and notions that tie states and peoples together, such as those between Russia (or the former Soviet Union) and Cyprus. He argues that the political realism coming from London and Washington since 1878 has consistently tilted policy outcomes toward Turkey, even though Turkey has been a gross violator of international normative and ethical behavior. Moreover, he argues that British and US influence in the region since the 1940s has consistently placed Cyprus on a course toward failure. This path, he writes, has included the unworkable constitutional arrangement that included three guarantor regimes; the acceptance of the illegal 1974 invasion; the unilateral declaration of independence by the Turkish Cypriots; the disastrous, “sinful,” and “illegal” Annan Plan of 2004; and the “punitive” “bailin” of 2013 during Cyprus’s financial crisis. Throughout, Melakopides argues that the only consistent supporter and friend of a weak Cypriot state has been Moscow, which recognized","PeriodicalId":298924,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Quarterly","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-4164314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Set in the increasingly relevant and complex eastern Mediterranean, Costas Melakopides’s RussiaCyprus Relations: A Pragmatic Idealist Perspective, deals with a subject that has been overlooked in contemporary geopolitical literature. Through a chronological examination of the relationship between Russia and Cyprus, Melakopides attempts to make a strong statement on two levels. First, he provides a distinct theoretical insight into the motivations driving Russian foreign policy in the region, and second, he juxtaposes the Russian approach to that of Britain and the United States. Melakopides argues from what he describes as a “practical idealist” perspective. For him, this means that there are ideas and notions that tie states and peoples together, such as those between Russia (or the former Soviet Union) and Cyprus. He argues that the political realism coming from London and Washington since 1878 has consistently tilted policy outcomes toward Turkey, even though Turkey has been a gross violator of international normative and ethical behavior. Moreover, he argues that British and US influence in the region since the 1940s has consistently placed Cyprus on a course toward failure. This path, he writes, has included the unworkable constitutional arrangement that included three guarantor regimes; the acceptance of the illegal 1974 invasion; the unilateral declaration of independence by the Turkish Cypriots; the disastrous, “sinful,” and “illegal” Annan Plan of 2004; and the “punitive” “bailin” of 2013 during Cyprus’s financial crisis. Throughout, Melakopides argues that the only consistent supporter and friend of a weak Cypriot state has been Moscow, which recognized
俄罗斯与塞浦路斯关系:一个实用主义的理想主义视角(科斯塔斯·梅拉科皮德斯)
科斯塔斯·梅拉科皮德斯的《俄罗斯与塞浦路斯关系:实用主义理想主义视角》以日益相关和复杂的东地中海为背景,探讨了一个在当代地缘政治文学中被忽视的主题。通过对俄罗斯和塞浦路斯之间关系的时间顺序检查,梅拉科皮德斯试图在两个层面上做出强有力的声明。首先,他对推动俄罗斯在该地区外交政策的动机提供了独特的理论见解,其次,他将俄罗斯的做法与英国和美国的做法并列。Melakopides从他所描述的“实践唯心主义者”的角度进行论证。对他来说,这意味着存在将国家和人民联系在一起的思想和观念,例如俄罗斯(或前苏联)与塞浦路斯之间的思想和观念。他认为,自1878年以来,来自伦敦和华盛顿的政治现实主义一直使政策结果向土耳其倾斜,尽管土耳其一直严重违反国际规范和道德行为。此外,他认为,自上世纪40年代以来,英国和美国在该地区的影响力一直将塞浦路斯推向失败的道路。他写道,这条道路包括行不通的宪法安排,其中包括三个担保政权;接受1974年的非法入侵;土族塞人单方面宣布独立;灾难性的、“罪恶的”和“非法的”2004年安南计划;以及2013年塞浦路斯金融危机期间的“惩罚性”“纾困”。自始至终,梅拉科皮德斯都认为,一个软弱的塞浦路斯国家唯一一贯的支持者和朋友是莫斯科,它承认了这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信