Comparison of IoT platform architectures: A field study based on a reference architecture

Jasmin Guth, Uwe Breitenbücher, Michael Falkenthal, F. Leymann, Lukas Reinfurt
{"title":"Comparison of IoT platform architectures: A field study based on a reference architecture","authors":"Jasmin Guth, Uwe Breitenbücher, Michael Falkenthal, F. Leymann, Lukas Reinfurt","doi":"10.1109/CIOT.2016.7872918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining increasing attention. The overall aim is to interconnect the physical with the digital world. Therefore, the physical world needs to be measured and translated into processible data. Further, data has to be translated into commands to be executed by actuators. Due to the growing awareness of IoT, the amount of offered IoT platforms rises as well. The heterogeneity of IoT platforms is the consequence of multiple different standards and approaches. This leads to problems of comprehension, which can occur during the design up to the selection of an appropriate solution. We tackle these issues by introducing an IoT reference architecture based on several state-of-the-art IoT platforms. Furthermore, the reference architecture is compared to three open-source and one proprietary IoT platform. The comparison shows that the reference architecture provides a uniform basis to understand, compare, and evaluate different IoT solutions. The considered state-of-the-art IoT platforms are OpenMTC, FIWARE, SiteWhere, and Amazon Web Services IoT.","PeriodicalId":222295,"journal":{"name":"2016 Cloudification of the Internet of Things (CIoT)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Cloudification of the Internet of Things (CIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIOT.2016.7872918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining increasing attention. The overall aim is to interconnect the physical with the digital world. Therefore, the physical world needs to be measured and translated into processible data. Further, data has to be translated into commands to be executed by actuators. Due to the growing awareness of IoT, the amount of offered IoT platforms rises as well. The heterogeneity of IoT platforms is the consequence of multiple different standards and approaches. This leads to problems of comprehension, which can occur during the design up to the selection of an appropriate solution. We tackle these issues by introducing an IoT reference architecture based on several state-of-the-art IoT platforms. Furthermore, the reference architecture is compared to three open-source and one proprietary IoT platform. The comparison shows that the reference architecture provides a uniform basis to understand, compare, and evaluate different IoT solutions. The considered state-of-the-art IoT platforms are OpenMTC, FIWARE, SiteWhere, and Amazon Web Services IoT.
物联网平台架构的比较:基于参考架构的实地研究
物联网(IoT)正受到越来越多的关注。总体目标是将物理世界与数字世界互联起来。因此,需要测量物理世界并将其转换为可处理的数据。此外,数据必须被转换成由执行器执行的命令。由于对物联网的认识不断提高,物联网平台的数量也在增加。物联网平台的异质性是多种不同标准和方法的结果。这导致了理解问题,这可能发生在设计到选择合适的解决方案的过程中。我们通过引入基于几个最先进的物联网平台的物联网参考架构来解决这些问题。此外,将参考架构与三个开源和一个专有物联网平台进行了比较。对比表明,参考架构为理解、比较和评估不同的物联网解决方案提供了统一的基础。被认为最先进的物联网平台是OpenMTC、FIWARE、SiteWhere和亚马逊网络服务物联网。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信