EU Data Protection Regulation and How It Affects Arbitration and ADR-ODR

Olga N. Tsiptse
{"title":"EU Data Protection Regulation and How It Affects Arbitration and ADR-ODR","authors":"Olga N. Tsiptse","doi":"10.52028/rbadr.v3i5.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 2018 a European Regulation, with direct force to all European Members, was in action. The General Data Protection Regulation, EU2016/679. A severe Regulation that was published in 2016 and set a 2-year period of time for all the Member States to be adjusted. This text, that implies huge fines for noncompliance, also affects the ADR mechanisms, like Arbitration, Mediation, etc. There is a paramount importance Principle of accountability, that GDPR implies, which requires data controllers to take personal responsibility for data protection compliance and record the measures they take to comply with their data protection obligations. Even almost 3 years have passed, the issues still remain: How is the interaction between ADR and GDPR? Which are the roles of the actors of alternative dispute resolution methods, and due to these roles which are the responsibilities? What is considered a lawful process, in accordance with GDPR, during the procedure of an ADR mechanism? It is also paramount to take into consideration, that the scope of that European Regulation affects directly even actors of non-EU territory, according to article 3.2 & 3 GDPR: 2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: - the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or – the monitoring of their behavior as far as their behavior takes place within the Union. 3. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the Union, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.","PeriodicalId":101933,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v3i5.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On May 2018 a European Regulation, with direct force to all European Members, was in action. The General Data Protection Regulation, EU2016/679. A severe Regulation that was published in 2016 and set a 2-year period of time for all the Member States to be adjusted. This text, that implies huge fines for noncompliance, also affects the ADR mechanisms, like Arbitration, Mediation, etc. There is a paramount importance Principle of accountability, that GDPR implies, which requires data controllers to take personal responsibility for data protection compliance and record the measures they take to comply with their data protection obligations. Even almost 3 years have passed, the issues still remain: How is the interaction between ADR and GDPR? Which are the roles of the actors of alternative dispute resolution methods, and due to these roles which are the responsibilities? What is considered a lawful process, in accordance with GDPR, during the procedure of an ADR mechanism? It is also paramount to take into consideration, that the scope of that European Regulation affects directly even actors of non-EU territory, according to article 3.2 & 3 GDPR: 2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: - the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or – the monitoring of their behavior as far as their behavior takes place within the Union. 3. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the Union, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.
欧盟数据保护条例及其对仲裁和ADR-ODR的影响
2018年5月,一项对所有欧洲成员国直接生效的欧洲法规开始实施。通用数据保护条例,EU2016/679。2016年发布了一项严格的法规,为所有成员国设定了两年的调整期。这一文本意味着对违规行为的巨额罚款,也影响了ADR机制,如仲裁、调解等。GDPR包含了一个至关重要的问责原则,它要求数据控制者对数据保护合规承担个人责任,并记录他们为遵守数据保护义务而采取的措施。即使过去了将近3年,ADR和GDPR之间的互动问题仍然存在。替代性争议解决方法的参与者的角色是什么?由于这些角色,他们的责任是什么?根据GDPR,在ADR机制的过程中,什么被认为是合法的过程?同样重要的是要考虑到,根据GDPR第3.2条和第3条,欧洲法规的范围甚至直接影响到非欧盟领土的行动者。本条例适用于不在欧盟设立的控制者或处理者对欧盟境内数据主体的个人数据的处理,如果处理活动涉及:—向欧盟境内的数据主体提供商品或服务,无论数据主体是否需要付款;或者-监控他们的行为,只要他们的行为发生在联盟内。本条例适用于控制者对个人数据的处理,该控制者不是在欧盟境内设立,而是根据国际公法在成员国法律适用的地方设立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书