{"title":"The Riksbank, Emergency Finance, Policy Experimentation, and Sweden's Reversal of Fortune","authors":"Joshua R. Hendrickson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3137151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 18th century, Sweden was an imperial power that had just sustained a century of modest economic growth. In 1800, Sweden's empire was gone, after a series of military defeats. Real GDP per capita had fallen to the same level as the early 1600s. In other words, the 18th century witnessed the end of the Swedish Empire and a startling reversal of economic progress. In this paper, I propose a possible explanation for both of these outcomes. First, I argue that Sweden's limited fiscal capacity played an important role. The creation of the Riksbank should have facilitated government borrowing and military spending as the Bank of England did for the British. However, the Riksbank was not designed or equipped for this role. I document the constraints on financing national defense through the Riksbank and argue that the bank was ill-equipped to finance an adequate national defense. This explains the reversal of the empire. Second, when the Hats took power in the Riksdag in 1739, they used the Riksbank to give loans to firms, which were financed through the issuance of bank notes. The objective was to increase investment and economic activity. I find no evidence that these loans had any effect on real GDP per capita. However, the resulting inflation has a negative and significant effect on output during the period of inconvertible paper money. The combined evidence suggests that Hat policy contributed to the decline in economic activity during the reversal of fortune.","PeriodicalId":224499,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3137151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
At the beginning of the 18th century, Sweden was an imperial power that had just sustained a century of modest economic growth. In 1800, Sweden's empire was gone, after a series of military defeats. Real GDP per capita had fallen to the same level as the early 1600s. In other words, the 18th century witnessed the end of the Swedish Empire and a startling reversal of economic progress. In this paper, I propose a possible explanation for both of these outcomes. First, I argue that Sweden's limited fiscal capacity played an important role. The creation of the Riksbank should have facilitated government borrowing and military spending as the Bank of England did for the British. However, the Riksbank was not designed or equipped for this role. I document the constraints on financing national defense through the Riksbank and argue that the bank was ill-equipped to finance an adequate national defense. This explains the reversal of the empire. Second, when the Hats took power in the Riksdag in 1739, they used the Riksbank to give loans to firms, which were financed through the issuance of bank notes. The objective was to increase investment and economic activity. I find no evidence that these loans had any effect on real GDP per capita. However, the resulting inflation has a negative and significant effect on output during the period of inconvertible paper money. The combined evidence suggests that Hat policy contributed to the decline in economic activity during the reversal of fortune.
18世纪初,瑞典是一个帝国强国,刚刚维持了一个世纪的适度经济增长。1800年,经过一系列的军事失败,瑞典帝国灭亡了。实际人均GDP下降到17世纪初的水平。换句话说,18世纪见证了瑞典帝国的终结和经济发展的惊人逆转。在本文中,我对这两种结果提出了一种可能的解释。首先,我认为瑞典有限的财政能力发挥了重要作用。瑞典央行(Riksbank)的创建本应促进政府借贷和军事开支,就像英格兰银行(Bank of England)为英国人所做的那样。然而,瑞典央行并不是为这一角色而设计或配备的。我记录了通过瑞典央行为国防融资的限制,并认为该银行没有能力为充分的国防融资。这解释了帝国的逆转。其次,1739年,当丹麦王室在瑞典国会掌权时,他们利用瑞典央行向企业提供贷款,这些贷款是通过发行银行票据来融资的。目标是增加投资和经济活动。我没有发现任何证据表明这些贷款对实际人均GDP有任何影响。然而,在不可兑换纸币时期,由此产生的通货膨胀对产出产生了负面和显著的影响。综合证据表明,在财富逆转期间,该政策导致了经济活动的下降。