The Riksbank, Emergency Finance, Policy Experimentation, and Sweden's Reversal of Fortune

Joshua R. Hendrickson
{"title":"The Riksbank, Emergency Finance, Policy Experimentation, and Sweden's Reversal of Fortune","authors":"Joshua R. Hendrickson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3137151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 18th century, Sweden was an imperial power that had just sustained a century of modest economic growth. In 1800, Sweden's empire was gone, after a series of military defeats. Real GDP per capita had fallen to the same level as the early 1600s. In other words, the 18th century witnessed the end of the Swedish Empire and a startling reversal of economic progress. In this paper, I propose a possible explanation for both of these outcomes. First, I argue that Sweden's limited fiscal capacity played an important role. The creation of the Riksbank should have facilitated government borrowing and military spending as the Bank of England did for the British. However, the Riksbank was not designed or equipped for this role. I document the constraints on financing national defense through the Riksbank and argue that the bank was ill-equipped to finance an adequate national defense. This explains the reversal of the empire. Second, when the Hats took power in the Riksdag in 1739, they used the Riksbank to give loans to firms, which were financed through the issuance of bank notes. The objective was to increase investment and economic activity. I find no evidence that these loans had any effect on real GDP per capita. However, the resulting inflation has a negative and significant effect on output during the period of inconvertible paper money. The combined evidence suggests that Hat policy contributed to the decline in economic activity during the reversal of fortune.","PeriodicalId":224499,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3137151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

At the beginning of the 18th century, Sweden was an imperial power that had just sustained a century of modest economic growth. In 1800, Sweden's empire was gone, after a series of military defeats. Real GDP per capita had fallen to the same level as the early 1600s. In other words, the 18th century witnessed the end of the Swedish Empire and a startling reversal of economic progress. In this paper, I propose a possible explanation for both of these outcomes. First, I argue that Sweden's limited fiscal capacity played an important role. The creation of the Riksbank should have facilitated government borrowing and military spending as the Bank of England did for the British. However, the Riksbank was not designed or equipped for this role. I document the constraints on financing national defense through the Riksbank and argue that the bank was ill-equipped to finance an adequate national defense. This explains the reversal of the empire. Second, when the Hats took power in the Riksdag in 1739, they used the Riksbank to give loans to firms, which were financed through the issuance of bank notes. The objective was to increase investment and economic activity. I find no evidence that these loans had any effect on real GDP per capita. However, the resulting inflation has a negative and significant effect on output during the period of inconvertible paper money. The combined evidence suggests that Hat policy contributed to the decline in economic activity during the reversal of fortune.
瑞典央行,紧急财政,政策实验,瑞典的命运逆转
18世纪初,瑞典是一个帝国强国,刚刚维持了一个世纪的适度经济增长。1800年,经过一系列的军事失败,瑞典帝国灭亡了。实际人均GDP下降到17世纪初的水平。换句话说,18世纪见证了瑞典帝国的终结和经济发展的惊人逆转。在本文中,我对这两种结果提出了一种可能的解释。首先,我认为瑞典有限的财政能力发挥了重要作用。瑞典央行(Riksbank)的创建本应促进政府借贷和军事开支,就像英格兰银行(Bank of England)为英国人所做的那样。然而,瑞典央行并不是为这一角色而设计或配备的。我记录了通过瑞典央行为国防融资的限制,并认为该银行没有能力为充分的国防融资。这解释了帝国的逆转。其次,1739年,当丹麦王室在瑞典国会掌权时,他们利用瑞典央行向企业提供贷款,这些贷款是通过发行银行票据来融资的。目标是增加投资和经济活动。我没有发现任何证据表明这些贷款对实际人均GDP有任何影响。然而,在不可兑换纸币时期,由此产生的通货膨胀对产出产生了负面和显著的影响。综合证据表明,在财富逆转期间,该政策导致了经济活动的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信