Rating Distribution and Personality Prediction for ImageAesthetics Assessment

Weisi Lin
{"title":"Rating Distribution and Personality Prediction for ImageAesthetics Assessment","authors":"Weisi Lin","doi":"10.1145/3423268.3423588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aesthetics has been an area of intensive interests and continuing exploration for long in multiple disciplines, such as philology, psychology, arts, photography, computer graphics, media, industrial design, and so on. Objective image aesthetic assessment (IAA) is related to three major considerations. First of all, technical quality assessment (TQA) of images still plays an important role in general, because basic visual features (e.g., contrast, brightness, colorfulness and semantic information) definitely influence humans' perception and experience. TQA has been already relatively better developed during the past two decades, so to be successful, IAA needs to focus more on the other two considerations that are special to it. The first consideration special to IAA is generic IAA (GIAA) which deals with aesthetic factors common to a typical human being or user, with examples of Rule of Thirds, symmetry, depth of field, object saliency, color Harmony, etc. The last special consideration is personalized IAA (PIAA) that is crucial in enabling many practical tasks, because \"beauty is in the eye of the beholder\". Compared with mere TQA, IAA is expected to be much more individualized, and machine learning provides an effective mean for the related tasks to be tackled. This talk will therefore introduce and discuss two issues particularly significant to PIAA: rating distribution prediction and personality-assisted aesthetic assessment. For the former, objective prediction will be demonstrated to be able to predict the subjective rating distribution (rather just the mean opinion score (MOS) in most existing TQA methods), since PIAA may have higher diversity of opinions from subjects (even with twin-peak distribution), especially for abstract art images. In such situations, a simple MOS estimation alone is far from the real opinions of aesthetics. For the latter, viewers/users of different personality (determined by the oft-used Big-Five scheme) have different preferences toward various categories of images. Personality prediction and its use in PIAA will be explored in hopes of creating more awareness and trigger further work in the related field.","PeriodicalId":393702,"journal":{"name":"Joint Workshop on Aesthetic and Technical Quality Assessment of Multimedia and Media Analytics for Societal Trends","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Workshop on Aesthetic and Technical Quality Assessment of Multimedia and Media Analytics for Societal Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3423268.3423588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aesthetics has been an area of intensive interests and continuing exploration for long in multiple disciplines, such as philology, psychology, arts, photography, computer graphics, media, industrial design, and so on. Objective image aesthetic assessment (IAA) is related to three major considerations. First of all, technical quality assessment (TQA) of images still plays an important role in general, because basic visual features (e.g., contrast, brightness, colorfulness and semantic information) definitely influence humans' perception and experience. TQA has been already relatively better developed during the past two decades, so to be successful, IAA needs to focus more on the other two considerations that are special to it. The first consideration special to IAA is generic IAA (GIAA) which deals with aesthetic factors common to a typical human being or user, with examples of Rule of Thirds, symmetry, depth of field, object saliency, color Harmony, etc. The last special consideration is personalized IAA (PIAA) that is crucial in enabling many practical tasks, because "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". Compared with mere TQA, IAA is expected to be much more individualized, and machine learning provides an effective mean for the related tasks to be tackled. This talk will therefore introduce and discuss two issues particularly significant to PIAA: rating distribution prediction and personality-assisted aesthetic assessment. For the former, objective prediction will be demonstrated to be able to predict the subjective rating distribution (rather just the mean opinion score (MOS) in most existing TQA methods), since PIAA may have higher diversity of opinions from subjects (even with twin-peak distribution), especially for abstract art images. In such situations, a simple MOS estimation alone is far from the real opinions of aesthetics. For the latter, viewers/users of different personality (determined by the oft-used Big-Five scheme) have different preferences toward various categories of images. Personality prediction and its use in PIAA will be explored in hopes of creating more awareness and trigger further work in the related field.
图像美学评价的评分分布与个性预测
长期以来,美学一直是语言学、心理学、艺术、摄影、计算机图形学、媒体、工业设计等多学科中一个备受关注和不断探索的领域。客观形象审美评价主要涉及三个方面的考虑。首先,图像的技术质量评估(technical quality assessment, TQA)在一般情况下仍然发挥着重要的作用,因为基本的视觉特征(如对比度、亮度、色彩和语义信息)肯定会影响人类的感知和体验。在过去的二十年里,TQA已经得到了相对较好的发展,所以为了取得成功,IAA需要更多地关注其他两个特殊的考虑因素。IAA的第一个特殊考虑是通用IAA (GIAA),它处理典型人类或用户共同的美学因素,例如三分法,对称,景深,物体显著性,颜色和谐等。最后需要特别考虑的是个性化IAA (PIAA),这对于实现许多实际任务至关重要,因为“情人眼里出西施”。与单纯的TQA相比,IAA有望更加个性化,机器学习为解决相关任务提供了有效的手段。因此,本讲座将介绍和讨论两个对PIAA特别重要的问题:评分分布预测和个性辅助审美评估。对于前者,客观预测将被证明能够预测主观评分分布(而不仅仅是大多数现有TQA方法中的平均意见得分(MOS)),因为PIAA可能具有更高的受试者意见多样性(即使是双峰分布),特别是对于抽象艺术图像。在这种情况下,一个简单的MOS估计与真正的美学观点相去甚远。对于后者,不同性格的观众/用户(由常用的Big-Five方案决定)对不同类别的图像有不同的偏好。我们将对人格预测及其在PIAA中的应用进行探索,希望能引起更多的关注,并引发相关领域的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信