Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship

B. Morgan
{"title":"Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship","authors":"B. Morgan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.962260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the introductory chapter of an edited volume of chapters by the same name, which will be published in 2007. Rights and regulation each provide a way of framing core preoccupations of sociolegal scholarship. The two are yoked more often in opposition than in concert; indeed, regulation has often been framed as a social practice that restricts rights. This resonates with a tendency to conjure up stereotypically different images of research questions and topics that typify each of these areas. Rights scholarship is concerned with mobilization, social change, questions of identity and culture, frequently taking the position of those who are disadvantaged or oppressed through judicial avenues, using claims of individualized entitlement as a point of departure. Regulation scholars are more typically concerned with questions of economic efficiency, the evaluation of results, rational design of institutions and bureaucratic or discretionary modes of pursuing generalized public interests. But if rights and regulation tend to be associated with contrasting forms, logics, ideals and values, there are ambiguities in this opposition. It may reflect parallel scholarly dialogues, or it may be rooted in inherent formal or normative properties of rights and regulation, or it may be a consequence of particular substantive political contexts that encourage groups to frame their own practices in particular ways - whether as rights-based or regulatory. This paper challenges stable oppositions between rights and regulation on all these fronts. Its main argument is that rights and regulation form overlapping and complementary aspects of processes of disputing and rule-elaboration that can be captured by two well-known triads - naming, blaming and claiming and rule-making, monitoring and enforcement. This approach both challenges the notion of contrasting logics of rights and regulation but also opens up interesting empirically-inspired questions at their intersection. It suggests that there is a powerful, albeit varying, interdependency between rights and regulation: one that can be clarified by encouraging more work in regulatory scholarship on naming, claiming and blaming, and more work in rights scholarship on rule-making, monitoring and implementation. The paper has four parts. First, it sketches a brief intellectual history of the strands of scholarship that frame this introduction, presenting rights and regulation initially as parallel scholarly dialogues, and then viewing them through a broad lens of disputing as complementary and interdependent. Secondly, it poses a wide range of questions that focus on different aspects of the rights/regulation interface. Third is an overview of the individual chapters in the rest of the volume, which come from a variety of disciplinary approaches within law and society (law, geography, sociology, political science, history and anthropology). Finally the paper proposes three key themes that emerge cumulatively from the chapters and that suggest future research directions. This paper will in its final form become the introductory chapter of an edited volume of chapters to be published in 2007 by Ashgate Press, with the same title as this opening essay. A brief table of contents and notes on the other contributors is appended at the end of the paper. The volume of essays originated in a four-day Summer Institute for advanced postgraduate students and early career academics in 'law and society' and socio-legal studies, held in Oxford in July 2005. The contributors comprise 9 of the original 24 participants. The Institute was sponsored by the Law and Society Association based in the US and by the UK Socio-legal Studies Association. It was the first of a consortium of three linked Institutes, all organised around the theme of the intersection of rights and regulation. The second Summer Institute took place in Johannesburg, South Africa in July 2006, and the third will take place in Amherst, USA in June 2007.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This paper is the introductory chapter of an edited volume of chapters by the same name, which will be published in 2007. Rights and regulation each provide a way of framing core preoccupations of sociolegal scholarship. The two are yoked more often in opposition than in concert; indeed, regulation has often been framed as a social practice that restricts rights. This resonates with a tendency to conjure up stereotypically different images of research questions and topics that typify each of these areas. Rights scholarship is concerned with mobilization, social change, questions of identity and culture, frequently taking the position of those who are disadvantaged or oppressed through judicial avenues, using claims of individualized entitlement as a point of departure. Regulation scholars are more typically concerned with questions of economic efficiency, the evaluation of results, rational design of institutions and bureaucratic or discretionary modes of pursuing generalized public interests. But if rights and regulation tend to be associated with contrasting forms, logics, ideals and values, there are ambiguities in this opposition. It may reflect parallel scholarly dialogues, or it may be rooted in inherent formal or normative properties of rights and regulation, or it may be a consequence of particular substantive political contexts that encourage groups to frame their own practices in particular ways - whether as rights-based or regulatory. This paper challenges stable oppositions between rights and regulation on all these fronts. Its main argument is that rights and regulation form overlapping and complementary aspects of processes of disputing and rule-elaboration that can be captured by two well-known triads - naming, blaming and claiming and rule-making, monitoring and enforcement. This approach both challenges the notion of contrasting logics of rights and regulation but also opens up interesting empirically-inspired questions at their intersection. It suggests that there is a powerful, albeit varying, interdependency between rights and regulation: one that can be clarified by encouraging more work in regulatory scholarship on naming, claiming and blaming, and more work in rights scholarship on rule-making, monitoring and implementation. The paper has four parts. First, it sketches a brief intellectual history of the strands of scholarship that frame this introduction, presenting rights and regulation initially as parallel scholarly dialogues, and then viewing them through a broad lens of disputing as complementary and interdependent. Secondly, it poses a wide range of questions that focus on different aspects of the rights/regulation interface. Third is an overview of the individual chapters in the rest of the volume, which come from a variety of disciplinary approaches within law and society (law, geography, sociology, political science, history and anthropology). Finally the paper proposes three key themes that emerge cumulatively from the chapters and that suggest future research directions. This paper will in its final form become the introductory chapter of an edited volume of chapters to be published in 2007 by Ashgate Press, with the same title as this opening essay. A brief table of contents and notes on the other contributors is appended at the end of the paper. The volume of essays originated in a four-day Summer Institute for advanced postgraduate students and early career academics in 'law and society' and socio-legal studies, held in Oxford in July 2005. The contributors comprise 9 of the original 24 participants. The Institute was sponsored by the Law and Society Association based in the US and by the UK Socio-legal Studies Association. It was the first of a consortium of three linked Institutes, all organised around the theme of the intersection of rights and regulation. The second Summer Institute took place in Johannesburg, South Africa in July 2006, and the third will take place in Amherst, USA in June 2007.
权利与监管的交集:社会法学研究的新方向
这篇论文是将于2007年出版的同名章节编辑卷的引言。权利和规则各自提供了一种构建社会法学研究核心关注点的方式。这两者往往是对立的,而不是一致的;事实上,监管常常被框定为一种限制权利的社会实践。这与一种倾向产生共鸣,即对这些领域的典型研究问题和主题产生刻板的不同印象。人权研究涉及动员、社会变革、身份和文化问题,经常通过司法途径站在弱势群体或受压迫者的立场上,以个人权利的主张为出发点。监管学者更典型地关注经济效率、结果评估、制度的合理设计以及追求普遍公共利益的官僚或自由裁量模式等问题。但是,如果权利和规则倾向于与对立的形式、逻辑、理想和价值观联系在一起,那么这种对立就存在歧义。它可能反映平行的学术对话,也可能根植于权利和监管固有的正式或规范属性,也可能是特定的实质性政治背景的结果,这种政治背景鼓励群体以特定的方式(无论是基于权利的还是监管的)构建自己的实践。本文在所有这些方面挑战了权利与监管之间的稳定对立。它的主要论点是,权利和监管构成了争议和规则制定过程的重叠和互补方面,可以通过两个众所周知的三位一体- -命名、指责和索赔以及规则制定、监督和执行- -来体现。这种方法既挑战了权利和监管的对比逻辑概念,也在它们的交叉点上开辟了有趣的经验启发问题。它表明,权利与监管之间存在着一种强大的相互依赖关系,尽管这种相互依赖关系各不相同:可以通过鼓励在命名、索赔和指责方面开展更多的监管研究,以及在规则制定、监督和实施方面开展更多的权利研究来澄清这种相互依赖关系。本文共分为四个部分。首先,它概述了构建本导论的学术流派的简短思想史,首先将权利和监管作为平行的学术对话呈现,然后通过争论的广泛视角将它们视为互补和相互依存的。其次,它提出了一系列广泛的问题,这些问题集中在权利/监管界面的不同方面。第三部分是对本书其余部分的个别章节的概述,这些章节来自法律和社会(法律、地理、社会学、政治学、历史和人类学)的各种学科方法。最后,本文提出了从各章中积累出来的三个关键主题,并提出了未来的研究方向。这篇论文的最终形式将成为阿什盖特出版社将于2007年出版的一本书的前言,书名与这篇开篇文章相同。在论文的末尾附有简要的目录和对其他贡献者的说明。2005年7月,牛津大学为“法律与社会”和社会法律研究领域的高级研究生和早期职业学者举办了为期四天的暑期研讨班。这些贡献者包括最初24名参与者中的9名。该研究所由美国法律与社会协会和英国社会法律研究协会赞助。这是由三个相互关联的研究所组成的联盟中的第一个,所有这些研究所都围绕权利与监管的交集这一主题组织起来。第二届夏令营于2006年7月在南非约翰内斯堡举行,第三届夏令营将于2007年6月在美国阿默斯特举行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信